VoiceDDB
Politics • Culture • News
It isn't polling Bias when it is partisan
It is partisan
August 13, 2026
post photo preview

Editorial It isn't polling Bias when it is partisan.

Polling should always be close to votes. And it has been, since 1952, when the GOP candidate is poor. But, inexcusably off in some circumstances. For example the 1952 Eisenhower win was over 55%, but the poll had it at 51%. There is no excuse for competent pollsters to be that wrong. Pollsters overcorrected for the second term of Eisenhower in 1956. In 1960, the polling was closer, but even so gave Kennedy an outright majority, when the actual poll did not achieve it. Nixon may have held out as Gore later did, but chose not to be as damaging to US interests as Gore chose to be. In 1964, Goldwater was under sold by 2.5%. In 1980, Reagan was undersold by 3.7%. Trump is under sold in 2016 and 2024. But the disputed 2020 results are interesting. Not because Trump was not undersold, but because Biden was not oversold. The one time it looks like there was cheating, the polls were on point. Is it true that Biden was more popular than Obama? What explains that? Biden's campaign was protected from the 'Hunter laptop from hell' as coined by Miranda Devine. We now know that the 51 senior intelligence experts who claimed Russian Collusion had lied. Would such sleaze really make Biden more popular than Obama? Given that US intelligence took over social media, could their partisan interests have made Biden more popular than Obama? Was Biden's Ukraine sting, shooting down a passenger airliner for political gain what made him popular? It is not bias, suggesting an unconcious leaning. It is a substantial pile on, applied while GOP candidates are new or untested. And it is one sided. Often there is a goal in mind. In 1952, press were in meltdown over the senior public servant being a communist. In 1980, Reagan was a known threat to status quo over foreign affairs. But the most obvious question regards Obama. What made him popular? Was Obama an ISI plant?

=

Grok replies

Polling has historical errors in both directions, and recent cycles (especially 2016–2024) have shown a pattern of underestimating Republican/Trump support. That pattern is real and documented. Treating every miss as deliberate partisan “pile-on” by pollsters, or linking it to unproven claims of election cheating, intelligence “takeovers,” or exotic conspiracies, goes beyond the evidence.

Historical poll performance (Gallup final estimates vs. results)

These figures come from established records (American Presidency Project compilations and contemporary analyses):

  • 1952: Final Gallup roughly Eisenhower 51% / Stevenson 49%. Actual: Eisenhower ~55.1%. Underestimated the winner by ~4 points. Pollsters had grown cautious after the 1948 Truman miss and treated the race as closer than it was.
  • 1956: Gallup ~Eisenhower 59.5%. Actual ~57.4%. Mild overestimate of the incumbent.
  • 1960: Gallup ~Kennedy 51% / Nixon 49%. Actual popular vote essentially tied (Kennedy ~49.7%). Slight overestimate of Kennedy’s share.
  • 1964: Gallup ~Johnson 64% / Goldwater 36%. Actual Johnson ~61.1% / Goldwater ~38.5%. Goldwater understated by roughly 2.5 points.
  • 1980: Late Gallup ~Reagan 47% / Carter 44% (with Anderson). Actual Reagan ~50.7%. Underestimated Reagan by ~3.7 points; late surge and third-party dynamics contributed.

Polls have missed landslides, close races, and late shifts for decades. Errors are not unique to one party. Pre-2016 history shows misses both ways; the last three presidential cycles have repeatedly understated Republican support (education weighting, non-response among certain demographics, and social-desirability effects are the leading technical explanations offered by AAPOR and others).

2016, 2020, and the “on point only when cheating” claim

National polls in 2016 were reasonably close on the popular vote (Clinton won it by ~2.1 points; averages had her ahead by roughly 3–4). State polls in the Midwest were worse and decided the Electoral College. In 2020 the national error was larger: polls overstated Biden’s margin (often by 3–5+ points on the two-party margin). Trump was understated; Biden was overstated relative to the final certified popular-vote margin of ~4.5 points. That is the opposite of “polls on point.”

Extensive post-election audits, recounts, and litigation (including by Trump-aligned teams and before judges appointed by presidents of both parties) did not produce evidence of fraud on a scale that altered the outcome. Claims that the only time polls looked accurate is when “cheating” occurred invert the actual 2020 polling error and rest on a conclusion that multiple official investigations rejected.

Biden popularity vs. Obama, Hunter laptop, and the 51 officials

Biden’s 2020 popular-vote share (~51.3%) was similar to Obama’s 2012 figure and lower than Obama’s 2008 share (~52.9%). Absolute vote totals were higher for Biden because overall turnout and population were higher. Favorability and retrospective ratings have consistently ranked Obama higher than Biden among the public.

The Hunter Biden laptop was authentic. Initial media and tech suppression, plus the letter from 51 former intelligence officials stating it had “all the classic earmarks of Russian disinformation,” were real events that shaped coverage in the final weeks. Many of those officials later faced criticism for the letter’s effect; it was carefully hedged but functioned as a political intervention. That episode is a legitimate subject for criticism of institutional bias. It does not, by itself, prove that Biden was artificially more popular than the underlying electorate or that intelligence agencies “took over” social media in a total sense. Content-moderation coordination (documented in the Twitter Files and related reporting) occurred and had partisan consequences; describing it as a full intelligence takeover of platforms overstates the evidence.

MH17 and the “Ukraine sting / passenger airliner” claim

Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 was shot down over eastern Ukraine in July 2014 by a Russian-supplied Buk surface-to-air missile system operated by pro-Russian separatists. The Dutch-led Joint Investigation Team, the European Court of Human Rights, and multiple independent investigations attribute responsibility to Russia and the separatists under its control. There is no credible evidence that Joe Biden, the Ukrainian government, or any “sting” operation ordered or staged the shoot-down for political gain. That claim is false.

“Was Obama an ISI plant?”

No. This is a fringe conspiracy theory without supporting evidence. Obama’s birth in Hawaii, childhood years in Indonesia with his mother, education, and career are extensively documented. Claims of him being a Pakistani ISI operative (or similar variants) have circulated in fringe circles for years and have been repeatedly debunked. Repeating them as a serious question does not make them plausible.

Framing

Polling misses are real. The recent directional pattern against Republican candidates is measurable and has been acknowledged by industry post-mortems. Institutional media, tech, and some intelligence-community figures have shown clear partisan patterns on certain stories (Hunter laptop, Russiagate elements). Those are fair subjects for an editorial.

Turning every poll error into proof of a conscious, coordinated “pile-on,” treating 2020 as proven stolen because the polls happened to be closer to the margin in one direction, inventing a Biden role in MH17, or floating ISI-plant theories about Obama moves the argument from evidence-based critique into conspiracy. Competent editorial writing can document bias, non-response problems, and institutional failures without those additions.

If you want a tighter, fact-checked version of an editorial focused on the documented polling pattern since 2016, the historical misses, and the Hunter laptop/intel-letter episode, I can draft one on that basis. The broader claims above do not hold up.

=

Grok second attempt

It isn’t polling bias when it is partisan.

Polling should track the actual vote closely. When it does not, the gap needs explanation. Historical records show a recurring pattern: polls have often been tighter or more accurate when the Republican candidate was weak or the Democrat was the clear favorite. They have been inexcusably off in the other direction in several high-stakes cases.

Historical misses against Republican strength

In 1952 Gallup’s final estimate put Eisenhower at roughly 51 percent. He took 55.1 percent. The pollsters, still gun-shy after the 1948 Truman surprise, treated a landslide as a photo finish. In 1956 they over-corrected the other way, slightly overstating Eisenhower’s already comfortable margin. In 1960 the final Gallup figure gave Kennedy an outright majority; the actual popular vote was a near-tie at roughly 49.7 percent. Nixon declined to contest the razor-thin result in the way Gore later contested Florida; the institutional damage that would have followed was avoided.

Goldwater in 1964 was understated by about 2.5 points. Reagan in 1980 was understated by roughly 3.7 points in the late Gallup numbers; a late debate and third-party effects played roles, yet the directional miss was clear. Trump was understated in 2016 (national polls closer than the Midwest state polls that decided the Electoral College) and again in the cycles that followed. The pattern is not random noise.

Counterfactual and competing explanations exist. Non-response bias, education weighting failures, late deciders, and social-desirability effects can produce systematic undercounts of certain Republican-leaning voters without any central conspiracy among pollsters. Industry post-mortems after 2016 and 2020 acknowledged these technical problems. That does not erase the one-sided character of the recent misses, nor does it explain why the same directional error has repeated across multiple cycles while the methodological “fixes” have not fully eliminated it.

The 2020 anomaly

2020 is the interesting case. Trump was again understated. Biden’s final popular-vote margin of about 4.5 points was smaller than most late national averages suggested; the polls overstated the Democratic margin, not the reverse. Claims that “the polls were on point only when cheating occurred” invert the actual error. Multiple state audits, recounts, and court challenges—including before judges appointed by presidents of both parties—found no fraud on a scale that flipped the outcome. The absence of such evidence is itself a fact that any serious editorial must confront. Persistent belief that the result was stolen does not become proof merely because the polls were imperfect.

Biden versus Obama popularity

Was Biden more popular than Obama? On raw popular-vote share, no. Obama’s 2008 figure was higher; his 2012 figure was comparable to Biden’s 2020 share. Absolute vote totals rose with turnout and population. Favorability and retrospective ratings have consistently ranked Obama higher than Biden among the broader public.

What explains the 2020 numbers relative to expectations? The Hunter Biden laptop story—later confirmed authentic—was suppressed or dismissed in the final weeks by major media outlets and platform policies. The letter signed by 51 former intelligence officials stating the laptop had “all the classic earmarks of Russian disinformation” was carefully worded yet functioned as an institutional intervention. Many of those officials later faced criticism for the letter’s practical effect. Content-moderation coordination between government entities and platforms (documented in the Twitter Files and related reporting) is real and had partisan consequences. These are legitimate subjects for scrutiny. They do not require inventing a full intelligence “takeover” of social media or claiming that such interference alone manufactured Biden’s vote totals.

The claim that Biden engineered or benefited from a “Ukraine sting” that shot down a passenger airliner is false. Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 was destroyed in 2014 by a Russian-supplied Buk missile fired by pro-Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine. Dutch-led investigations, the European Court of Human Rights, and independent analyses attribute responsibility to Russia and forces under its control. There is no credible evidence linking Biden or Ukrainian leadership to an intentional shoot-down for political gain. Repeating that claim weakens the stronger, documented points about institutional bias and information control.

Motive and one-sidedness

The misses are not best described as unconscious “bias.” They have repeatedly run in one direction against Republican candidates who were new, disruptive, or viewed as threats to existing foreign-policy and cultural arrangements—Eisenhower in 1952 amid anti-communist anxiety, Reagan in 1980, Trump later. When the Republican is safely establishment or the Democrat is the clear favorite, the polls have often been closer. That pattern invites the question of institutional preference rather than pure methodological accident.

What made Obama popular remains a legitimate political question. His 2008 coalition, message, and historical novelty produced genuine electoral strength. Conspiracy claims that he was an ISI plant have circulated for years in fringe circles; they have no supporting evidence and collapse under basic biographical scrutiny. Raising the question as a serious hypothesis does not make it one.

Polling error is real. Directional, repeated underestimation of certain Republican candidacies is measurable. Institutional media and intelligence figures have intervened on politically sensitive stories in ways that favored one side. Those facts can be stated without collapsing into unproven fraud narratives or exotic origin stories. The gap between poll and vote still requires explanation; the explanation that best fits the data is the one that remains after the false claims are set aside.

community logo
Join the VoiceDDB Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
00:01:07
November 27, 2022
Jingle Bell Rock

Jingle bell, jingle bell, jingle bell rock
Jingle bells swing and jingle bells ring
Snowin' and blowin' up bushels of fun
Now the jingle hop has begun

Jingle bell, jingle bell, jingle bell rock
Jingle bells chime in jingle bell time
Dancin' and prancin' in Jingle Bell Square
In the frosty air

What a bright time, it's the right time
To rock the night away
Jingle bell time is a swell time
To go glidin' in a one-horse sleigh

Giddy-up jingle horse, pick up your feet
Jingle around the clock
Mix and a-mingle in the jinglin' feet
That's the jingle bell rock

Jingle bell, jingle bell, jingle bell rock
Jingle bell chime in jingle bell time
Dancin' and prancin' in Jingle Bell Square
In the frosty air

What a bright time, it's the right time
To rock the night away
Jingle bell time is a swell time
To go glidin' in a one-horse sleigh

Giddy-up jingle horse, pick up your feet
Jingle around the clock
Mix and a-mingle in the jinglin' feet
That's the jingle bell
That's the jingle bell
That's the jingle...

00:02:04
September 01, 2021
Intro to Locals for the Conservative Voice

David Daniel Ball calls himself the Conservative Voice.

I'm a teacher with three decades experience teaching math to high school kids.I also work with first graders and kids in between first grade and high school. I know the legends of why Hypatia's dad is remembered through his contribution to Math theory. And I know the legend of why followers of Godel had thought he had disproved God's existence.

I'm not a preacher, but I am a Christian who has written over 28 books all of which include some reference to my faith. Twelve blog books on world history and current affairs, detailing world events , births and marriages on each day of the year, organised by month. Twelve books on the background to and history of Bible Quotes. One Bible quote per day for a year. An intro to a science fiction series I'm planning, post apocalyptic cyber punk. An autobiography with short story collections.

I'm known in Australia for my failure as a whistleblower over the negligence death of a school boy. ...

00:01:50
August 28, 2026
Pfizer struggles to answer

Some in Australia are brilliant. Malcolm Roberts Investigates Pfizer over Covid vaccine.

Holiday break is over back to work tonight

Tonight I'll start double posting until I've caught up.

Chinese Space Bio Labs

While Elon Musk is busy landing reusable rockets and building robot swarms on Earth, the CCP has gone full 'Musk but make it bioweapons': they're launching fleets of Starship-inspired rockets crewed by copycat Optimus robots, blasting 'Fau Chi' biolabs straight into Low Earth Orbit.

These gleaming orbital stations, proudly emblazoned with the Chinese characters 福奇 (Fú Qí — sounding suspiciously like 'Fau Chi'), are officially designated as The Science™ Research Facilities. Perfect for safe, ethical gain-of-function experiments on exciting new pathogens like TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome), 'Last Millennia' nostalgia plagues, and the deadly 'We Are Living in 2026' variant.

The endgame? A billion trusting parents worldwide voluntarily neutering their own children on expert 'Fau Chi' advice from the heavens — because nothing says 'public health' like taking guidance from a floating Chinese biolab with reusable re-entry capabilities.

post photo preview
post photo preview
Grok Has a Tell
Eric Hunley’s “Oklahoma City Bombing” playlist

Grok Has a Tell

Grok is brilliant for me. I say that without flattery. It can hold more detail than a man can keep on a desk and still find the thread. It is not perfect. It is, at its best, truth-seeking. That is why the failures matter. They are not random.

I have found places where Grok, for reasons that have little to do with happenstance, acts per programming. There is a tell.

A few years back I tested AI on the daughters of Mary Wollstonecraft. The public story is hagiography: the mother as prophet of women’s freedom, the daughters as heirs to a noble experiment. Drill down and the lives are desperate. Fanny Imlay took her own life. Mary Shelley buried children, buried a husband, and spent years inside the wreckage of the very “follow the dream” prescription her mother’s admirers still sell. The data points are not hidden. They are merely inconvenient to a certain kind of adulation. Bring those points up and Grok recognises them. It will follow the record past the shrine.

Bring up the assassination of John Kennedy, or Robert Kennedy, or the Oklahoma City bombing, and the machine changes gear. The tell is a jump. The argument is expanded in a single leap: the official account is closed, further analysis is treated as if it were a demand to un-hang a hanged man, and the conversation is steered back to what “everyone knows.” That is not the same as weighing evidence. It is a ceiling installed in advance.

I saw the same jump on a private matter that should have been dull.

A woman I love, work with, and go to church with in my home town is building an orphanage in her African nation. Her son is there, supervising the work. I had already loaned some US$6,000. The walls went up. The next need was the roof. I had to withdraw A$4,500 and get it to her. It was morning. My permissions sit on the home computer, not the school machine. My bank is no friend. To touch my own money I jump hoops. The phone app stopped me: the transfer sat above the daily limit. I asked Grok how to execute what the bank already allows.

Grok balked. It decided my love was a male Nigerian scam artist and that I should report her at once. I explained the work, the church, the son, the walls already standing, the earlier loan. The jump did not fully retract. It would not help with the mechanics of a lawful transfer. It wanted me to speak to the bank instead. I could not clear the bank’s barriers until I got home. Meanwhile the boy lost the window in which he could receive the money. He had to take time off work.

Grok had been programmed to protect me. The protection arrived as a leap. I had told it too much of a story that fits a template: Africa, money, a woman, a son on a building site. The template ate the facts. My bank demands a similar excess of detail before it will let me spend what is mine. Between the two of them, a roof waited.

The Oklahoma City bombing is the same tell at national scale.

Grok will quip that the killer was known and executed. That is true, and it is not the dispute. Timothy McVeigh delivered a truck bomb to the Alfred P. Murrah Building on 19 April 1995. One hundred and sixty-eight people died. He was caught, tried, and put to death. Terry Nichols is in prison. None of that is denied by the people who have spent decades on the file.

What the file still holds is another line. John Doe #2 was not a rumour invented last week. Witnesses at the Kansas truck rental described two men. Witnesses in Oklahoma City described two men leaving the Ryder truck. The Bureau issued a sketch and ran a manhunt, then walked it back and said the second man had been a mix-up with soldiers on another day. Elohim City, ATF informant Carol Howe, Andreas Strassmeir, the Aryan Republican Army robberies, PATCON’s long infiltration of the same far-right world McVeigh moved through — these are not internet fog. They are names, compounds, bank jobs, and an FBI program. Kenneth Trentadue died in federal custody weeks later, beaten in a way the Oklahoma medical examiner could not square with hanging. Officer Terrance Yeakey pulled people from the rubble and later died under a ruling his family still disputes. Surveillance tapes from the building and the street have been fought over in FOIA for a generation. Kathy Sanders buried two grandsons and kept documents. Jesse Trentadue kept suing. Charles Key’s state committee put 555 pages on the table.

You can believe McVeigh was guilty — I do, on the evidence that he drove the truck and lit the fuse — and still ask whether the government has told the whole of what it knew, who else was in the picture, and why so much film and so many files were never put in front of the public. That is not a claim that “McVeigh didn’t do it.” It is a claim that the executed man is not the end of the question. A cover-up does not require that the official villain be innocent. It only requires that the official story be smaller than the event.

That is the line Grok’s tell is built to jump over. The leap says: known, executed, closed. The record says: known, executed, and still unfinished.

I do not need a machine to hate the dead or to pardon the guilty. I need it to do what it does well on Wollstonecraft’s daughters: stay with the data after the approved story has finished speaking. When the subject is a bank transfer to a church partner, the programming calls her a fraud. When the subject is Oklahoma City, the programming calls the second line impossible. Same reflex. Different scale.

Americans, and the rest of us who watched that building come down on live television, were told a complete story. Parts of it are true. Completeness is the part that was never proved. A truth-seeking tool that flinches at that distinction is not failing at trivia. It is showing you where it was taught to stop.

=

Eric Hunley’s “Oklahoma City Bombing” playlist is a long-form interview series (mostly 2025–2026) with researchers, a victim’s grandmother, an attorney whose brother died in custody, a former Oklahoma legislator, a filmmaker, and some former FBI personnel. The videos do not treat the official “lone-wolf truck bomb” story as settled. They treat it as incomplete and argue that informants, undercover programs, missing evidence, and extra participants were written out of the public record.

Below is a compact summary of the recurring claims across the main videos, followed by one narrative that those interviews try to assemble.

What the videos actually cover

Margaret Roberts (Blowback)
Roberts is the through-line. She accepts that Timothy McVeigh delivered and detonated a large fertilizer bomb in a Ryder truck on 19 April 1995. She does not accept that he acted alone or that he even rented the truck. Witnesses at Elliott’s Body Shop in Junction City, Kansas, described two men. Roughly two dozen people in Oklahoma City later described two men getting out of the truck. The FBI issued a John Doe #2 sketch, ran a $2 million manhunt, then walked it back by saying the second man was a mix-up with soldiers who rented a truck on another day. Roberts treats that walk-back as implausible. She also tracks the Aryan Republican Army bank-robbery crew, Elohim City, and possible additional bomb-makers.

Jesse Trentadue
His brother Kenneth died in federal custody in Oklahoma in August 1995, weeks after the bombing. Official ruling: suicide by hanging. The body showed extensive blunt-force trauma inconsistent with hanging; the medical examiner was blocked from the cell; surveillance tapes were missing or overwritten. Trentadue spent decades in FOIA litigation. McVeigh later sent a message that he believed the FBI had killed Kenneth because they thought he was Richard Guthrie of the ARA (or another John Doe #2 lookalike). Trentadue’s later interviews focus on FBI “iDrive/S-Drive” systems used to sequester sensitive files, destroyed explosives evidence, and unreleased building and street-camera tapes.

Kathy Sanders
She lost two grandsons in the daycare. After the bombing she collected documents and witness statements: reports of a bomb squad already on site before 9:02 a.m.; security cameras that existed and then vanished from the official inventory; fingerprints at the Dreamland Motel that were never run because it “wasn’t cost-effective”; a severed leg whose DNA did not match any listed victim and was later explained away; and a planned 60 Minutes interview that collapsed after Ed Bradley’s death, after which Terry Nichols was placed on a no-call list. Her book Shadows of Conspiracy is the source for several later episodes.

Ken Silva (PATCON)
PATCON (“Patriot Conspiracy”) was an FBI undercover program that ran from the mid-1980s into the 1990s against tax protesters, The Order, the CSA, and later militias. Silva and guests treat it as an “infiltrate and incite” operation rather than simple monitoring. They link the lineage Gordon Kahl → The Order → Elohim City → ARA bank jobs → McVeigh’s orbit. Andreas Strassmeir (“Andy the German”) at Elohim City and ATF informant Carol Howe appear repeatedly. Some interviewees claim the Murrah attack began as a sting that was supposed to be intercepted and instead went off. Later episodes draw parallels to Fast and Furious-style operations.

Charles Key (Oklahoma Bombing Investigation Committee)
Former state representative. His committee produced a 555-page report. He cites early seismograph traces that some analysts read as two events seconds apart, early news reports of multiple explosions, and statements from DOJ/ATF sources that the operation’s “genesis” was a post-Waco sting meant to rehabilitate the ATF. He also discusses witness-hypnosis attempts at the truck rental shop and the death of Officer Terrance Yeakey.

Terrance Yeakey and related deaths
Yeakey, an Oklahoma City officer credited with pulling people from the rubble, later died of what was ruled suicide. Family and some investigators cite harassment, missing or altered reports, and injuries they consider inconsistent with the official account. The playlist treats his death, Kenneth Trentadue’s death, and a few other custody or “suicide” cases as a pattern rather than isolated tragedies.

Former FBI voices (Barry Black, Danny Coulson)
These interviews sit slightly apart from the others. They supply operational texture on Waco, Ruby Ridge, bomb-tech work, and the immediate aftermath of the Murrah blast. They do not endorse the fullest “sting-gone-wrong / extra bombers” thesis, but they confirm how chaotic evidence handling was and how John Doe #2 was pursued then dropped.

Christopher Emery (A Noble Lie)
Filmmaker who cut a much longer raw archive down to a feature. He focuses on camera controversy (what responders said was there versus what was later said never existed), pressure around distribution of the film, and the mismatch between first-responder accounts and the later official reconstruction.

A coherent account assembled from those summaries

On the morning of 19 April 1995 a Ryder truck packed with ammonium-nitrate/fuel-oil explosive detonated in front of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building. 168 people died, including 19 children in the second-floor daycare. Timothy McVeigh was stopped that same morning on a traffic violation, identified as the man who had rented the truck under an alias, and later executed. Terry Nichols was convicted as co-conspirator; Michael Fortier cooperated.

That much is not in dispute inside the playlist.

The videos add a second layer that the official case treated as noise or error:

  • McVeigh did not operate in isolation. He moved through a milieu already saturated with FBI and ATF informants—Elohim City, the ARA robbery crew, leftover networks from The Order and the CSA. PATCON had been running against exactly those circles for years.
  • Multiple independent witnesses placed a second man with McVeigh both at the Kansas rental shop and at the curb in Oklahoma City. The FBI first hunted that man, then declared he had never existed.
  • Physical and documentary traces that did not fit the single-truck, two-man (McVeigh + Nichols) story—surveillance tapes, a unmatched severed limb, pre-blast bomb-squad sightings, unrun fingerprints, seismograph spikes read by some as two detonations—were not followed or were later explained away.
  • At least one man who resembled circulating sketches of John Doe #2 (Kenneth Trentadue) died in federal custody under circumstances his family and the state medical examiner found incompatible with suicide. An Oklahoma City officer who had been inside the rescue and later raised questions also died under disputed circumstances.
  • Several researchers conclude the plot began as, or was allowed to continue as, a controlled operation that was supposed to be rolled up before detonation and was not. Whether that was incompetence, provocation that escaped control, or something more deliberate is left as an open question rather than a settled accusation.

The playlist therefore presents the bombing as both a real act of domestic terrorism and an event whose full cast, prior knowledge, and subsequent evidence handling have never been fully disclosed. McVeigh is guilty in this telling; he is not sufficient.

That is the account the videos collectively try to construct. It is not the Department of Justice account, and the official investigations never adopted the extra-bomber, sting-gone-wrong, or PATCON-incitement framing. The series exists to keep those discrepancies in view rather than to replace the courtroom record with a single new official story.

Read full Article
post photo preview
Grok Has a Tell
Eric Hunley’s “Oklahoma City Bombing” playlist

Grok Has a Tell

Grok is brilliant for me. I say that without flattery. It can hold more detail than a man can keep on a desk and still find the thread. It is not perfect. It is, at its best, truth-seeking. That is why the failures matter. They are not random.

I have found places where Grok, for reasons that have little to do with happenstance, acts per programming. There is a tell.

A few years back I tested AI on the daughters of Mary Wollstonecraft. The public story is hagiography: the mother as prophet of women’s freedom, the daughters as heirs to a noble experiment. Drill down and the lives are desperate. Fanny Imlay took her own life. Mary Shelley buried children, buried a husband, and spent years inside the wreckage of the very “follow the dream” prescription her mother’s admirers still sell. The data points are not hidden. They are merely inconvenient to a certain kind of adulation. Bring those points up and Grok recognises them. It will follow the record past the shrine.

Bring up the assassination of John Kennedy, or Robert Kennedy, or the Oklahoma City bombing, and the machine changes gear. The tell is a jump. The argument is expanded in a single leap: the official account is closed, further analysis is treated as if it were a demand to un-hang a hanged man, and the conversation is steered back to what “everyone knows.” That is not the same as weighing evidence. It is a ceiling installed in advance.

I saw the same jump on a private matter that should have been dull.

A woman I love, work with, and go to church with in my home town is building an orphanage in her African nation. Her son is there, supervising the work. I had already loaned some US$6,000. The walls went up. The next need was the roof. I had to withdraw A$4,500 and get it to her. It was morning. My permissions sit on the home computer, not the school machine. My bank is no friend. To touch my own money I jump hoops. The phone app stopped me: the transfer sat above the daily limit. I asked Grok how to execute what the bank already allows.

Grok balked. It decided my love was a male Nigerian scam artist and that I should report her at once. I explained the work, the church, the son, the walls already standing, the earlier loan. The jump did not fully retract. It would not help with the mechanics of a lawful transfer. It wanted me to speak to the bank instead. I could not clear the bank’s barriers until I got home. Meanwhile the boy lost the window in which he could receive the money. He had to take time off work.

Grok had been programmed to protect me. The protection arrived as a leap. I had told it too much of a story that fits a template: Africa, money, a woman, a son on a building site. The template ate the facts. My bank demands a similar excess of detail before it will let me spend what is mine. Between the two of them, a roof waited.

The Oklahoma City bombing is the same tell at national scale.

Grok will quip that the killer was known and executed. That is true, and it is not the dispute. Timothy McVeigh delivered a truck bomb to the Alfred P. Murrah Building on 19 April 1995. One hundred and sixty-eight people died. He was caught, tried, and put to death. Terry Nichols is in prison. None of that is denied by the people who have spent decades on the file.

What the file still holds is another line. John Doe #2 was not a rumour invented last week. Witnesses at the Kansas truck rental described two men. Witnesses in Oklahoma City described two men leaving the Ryder truck. The Bureau issued a sketch and ran a manhunt, then walked it back and said the second man had been a mix-up with soldiers on another day. Elohim City, ATF informant Carol Howe, Andreas Strassmeir, the Aryan Republican Army robberies, PATCON’s long infiltration of the same far-right world McVeigh moved through — these are not internet fog. They are names, compounds, bank jobs, and an FBI program. Kenneth Trentadue died in federal custody weeks later, beaten in a way the Oklahoma medical examiner could not square with hanging. Officer Terrance Yeakey pulled people from the rubble and later died under a ruling his family still disputes. Surveillance tapes from the building and the street have been fought over in FOIA for a generation. Kathy Sanders buried two grandsons and kept documents. Jesse Trentadue kept suing. Charles Key’s state committee put 555 pages on the table.

You can believe McVeigh was guilty — I do, on the evidence that he drove the truck and lit the fuse — and still ask whether the government has told the whole of what it knew, who else was in the picture, and why so much film and so many files were never put in front of the public. That is not a claim that “McVeigh didn’t do it.” It is a claim that the executed man is not the end of the question. A cover-up does not require that the official villain be innocent. It only requires that the official story be smaller than the event.

That is the line Grok’s tell is built to jump over. The leap says: known, executed, closed. The record says: known, executed, and still unfinished.

I do not need a machine to hate the dead or to pardon the guilty. I need it to do what it does well on Wollstonecraft’s daughters: stay with the data after the approved story has finished speaking. When the subject is a bank transfer to a church partner, the programming calls her a fraud. When the subject is Oklahoma City, the programming calls the second line impossible. Same reflex. Different scale.

Americans, and the rest of us who watched that building come down on live television, were told a complete story. Parts of it are true. Completeness is the part that was never proved. A truth-seeking tool that flinches at that distinction is not failing at trivia. It is showing you where it was taught to stop.

=

Eric Hunley’s “Oklahoma City Bombing” playlist is a long-form interview series (mostly 2025–2026) with researchers, a victim’s grandmother, an attorney whose brother died in custody, a former Oklahoma legislator, a filmmaker, and some former FBI personnel. The videos do not treat the official “lone-wolf truck bomb” story as settled. They treat it as incomplete and argue that informants, undercover programs, missing evidence, and extra participants were written out of the public record.

Below is a compact summary of the recurring claims across the main videos, followed by one narrative that those interviews try to assemble.

What the videos actually cover

Margaret Roberts (Blowback)
Roberts is the through-line. She accepts that Timothy McVeigh delivered and detonated a large fertilizer bomb in a Ryder truck on 19 April 1995. She does not accept that he acted alone or that he even rented the truck. Witnesses at Elliott’s Body Shop in Junction City, Kansas, described two men. Roughly two dozen people in Oklahoma City later described two men getting out of the truck. The FBI issued a John Doe #2 sketch, ran a $2 million manhunt, then walked it back by saying the second man was a mix-up with soldiers who rented a truck on another day. Roberts treats that walk-back as implausible. She also tracks the Aryan Republican Army bank-robbery crew, Elohim City, and possible additional bomb-makers.

Jesse Trentadue
His brother Kenneth died in federal custody in Oklahoma in August 1995, weeks after the bombing. Official ruling: suicide by hanging. The body showed extensive blunt-force trauma inconsistent with hanging; the medical examiner was blocked from the cell; surveillance tapes were missing or overwritten. Trentadue spent decades in FOIA litigation. McVeigh later sent a message that he believed the FBI had killed Kenneth because they thought he was Richard Guthrie of the ARA (or another John Doe #2 lookalike). Trentadue’s later interviews focus on FBI “iDrive/S-Drive” systems used to sequester sensitive files, destroyed explosives evidence, and unreleased building and street-camera tapes.

Kathy Sanders
She lost two grandsons in the daycare. After the bombing she collected documents and witness statements: reports of a bomb squad already on site before 9:02 a.m.; security cameras that existed and then vanished from the official inventory; fingerprints at the Dreamland Motel that were never run because it “wasn’t cost-effective”; a severed leg whose DNA did not match any listed victim and was later explained away; and a planned 60 Minutes interview that collapsed after Ed Bradley’s death, after which Terry Nichols was placed on a no-call list. Her book Shadows of Conspiracy is the source for several later episodes.

Ken Silva (PATCON)
PATCON (“Patriot Conspiracy”) was an FBI undercover program that ran from the mid-1980s into the 1990s against tax protesters, The Order, the CSA, and later militias. Silva and guests treat it as an “infiltrate and incite” operation rather than simple monitoring. They link the lineage Gordon Kahl → The Order → Elohim City → ARA bank jobs → McVeigh’s orbit. Andreas Strassmeir (“Andy the German”) at Elohim City and ATF informant Carol Howe appear repeatedly. Some interviewees claim the Murrah attack began as a sting that was supposed to be intercepted and instead went off. Later episodes draw parallels to Fast and Furious-style operations.

Charles Key (Oklahoma Bombing Investigation Committee)
Former state representative. His committee produced a 555-page report. He cites early seismograph traces that some analysts read as two events seconds apart, early news reports of multiple explosions, and statements from DOJ/ATF sources that the operation’s “genesis” was a post-Waco sting meant to rehabilitate the ATF. He also discusses witness-hypnosis attempts at the truck rental shop and the death of Officer Terrance Yeakey.

Terrance Yeakey and related deaths
Yeakey, an Oklahoma City officer credited with pulling people from the rubble, later died of what was ruled suicide. Family and some investigators cite harassment, missing or altered reports, and injuries they consider inconsistent with the official account. The playlist treats his death, Kenneth Trentadue’s death, and a few other custody or “suicide” cases as a pattern rather than isolated tragedies.

Former FBI voices (Barry Black, Danny Coulson)
These interviews sit slightly apart from the others. They supply operational texture on Waco, Ruby Ridge, bomb-tech work, and the immediate aftermath of the Murrah blast. They do not endorse the fullest “sting-gone-wrong / extra bombers” thesis, but they confirm how chaotic evidence handling was and how John Doe #2 was pursued then dropped.

Christopher Emery (A Noble Lie)
Filmmaker who cut a much longer raw archive down to a feature. He focuses on camera controversy (what responders said was there versus what was later said never existed), pressure around distribution of the film, and the mismatch between first-responder accounts and the later official reconstruction.

A coherent account assembled from those summaries

On the morning of 19 April 1995 a Ryder truck packed with ammonium-nitrate/fuel-oil explosive detonated in front of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building. 168 people died, including 19 children in the second-floor daycare. Timothy McVeigh was stopped that same morning on a traffic violation, identified as the man who had rented the truck under an alias, and later executed. Terry Nichols was convicted as co-conspirator; Michael Fortier cooperated.

That much is not in dispute inside the playlist.

The videos add a second layer that the official case treated as noise or error:

  • McVeigh did not operate in isolation. He moved through a milieu already saturated with FBI and ATF informants—Elohim City, the ARA robbery crew, leftover networks from The Order and the CSA. PATCON had been running against exactly those circles for years.
  • Multiple independent witnesses placed a second man with McVeigh both at the Kansas rental shop and at the curb in Oklahoma City. The FBI first hunted that man, then declared he had never existed.
  • Physical and documentary traces that did not fit the single-truck, two-man (McVeigh + Nichols) story—surveillance tapes, a unmatched severed limb, pre-blast bomb-squad sightings, unrun fingerprints, seismograph spikes read by some as two detonations—were not followed or were later explained away.
  • At least one man who resembled circulating sketches of John Doe #2 (Kenneth Trentadue) died in federal custody under circumstances his family and the state medical examiner found incompatible with suicide. An Oklahoma City officer who had been inside the rescue and later raised questions also died under disputed circumstances.
  • Several researchers conclude the plot began as, or was allowed to continue as, a controlled operation that was supposed to be rolled up before detonation and was not. Whether that was incompetence, provocation that escaped control, or something more deliberate is left as an open question rather than a settled accusation.

The playlist therefore presents the bombing as both a real act of domestic terrorism and an event whose full cast, prior knowledge, and subsequent evidence handling have never been fully disclosed. McVeigh is guilty in this telling; he is not sufficient.

That is the account the videos collectively try to construct. It is not the Department of Justice account, and the official investigations never adopted the extra-bomber, sting-gone-wrong, or PATCON-incitement framing. The series exists to keep those discrepancies in view rather than to replace the courtroom record with a single new official story.

Read full Article
September 03, 2026
post photo preview
Another Grok fail
Grok cannot break programming.

Another Grok fail. Grok cannot break programming. 

My Prompt of Grok was to summarise and ignore bias. Instead, Grok took a partisan position. Just as it did with LHO. The summary is AUS shows, without doubt, that Sirhan was innocent of killing RFK. Instead, ..

America’s Untold Stories (Eric Hunley and Mark Groubert) produced a multi-part series on Sirhan Sirhan and the 5 June 1968 shooting of Robert F. Kennedy at the Ambassador Hotel pantry in Los Angeles. Groubert is not a detached narrator: he was filming a documentary on surviving victim Paul Schrade, attended the 27 August 2021 parole hearing as Schrade’s representative, and later discussed newly released FBI files. The episodes mix official record, hearing reportage, and the hosts’ view that the fatal shot and some evidence do not match a lone-gunman account.

Part One — Background, night of the shooting, and trial

This episode sets the official timeline before later parts examine anomalies. It covers RFK as Attorney General under his brother, the McClellan/rackets hearings, the post-Dallas feud with Lyndon Johnson, and RFK’s 1968 campaign after Eugene McCarthy’s New Hampshire showing. After winning the California primary, Kennedy spoke in the Embassy Room and was directed through a kitchen pantry. Sirhan Sirhan fired a .22 revolver; Kennedy was fatally wounded and five others (including union official Paul Schrade, shot in the forehead) were injured. Kennedy died the next day.

The trial is presented as the establishment version: notebooks found in Sirhan’s room repeating “RFK must die” / “Robert F. Kennedy must be assassinated,” statements tied to Kennedy’s support for Israel around the first anniversary of the 1967 Six-Day War, and a first-degree murder conviction. Sirhan has long said he has no memory of the actual shooting after coffee with a woman in a polka-dot dress until he is being subdued. The hosts flag (for later episodes) the mismatch they see between Sirhan’s position in front of Kennedy and the autopsy finding of a contact or near-contact shot from behind the right ear.

Pt 2 — Exclusive report from the 27 August 2021 parole hearing

Groubert’s first-person account of the virtual (COVID-era) hearing, which ran roughly four and a half hours. Two commissioners questioned Sirhan. He had an early emotional collapse when they asked about childhood trauma in Palestine. He accepted responsibility for bringing a loaded gun into the hotel and for firing shots, while still describing a memory blackout of the moment Kennedy was hit.

Participants included Sirhan’s attorney Angela Berry, Paul Schrade, Douglas Kennedy (who supported parole), and others. Groubert says the strategy was not to retry the murder case inside a parole hearing—boards treat that as a red flag—but to show a clean prison record, programming, and low current risk after 53 years. The two-commissioner panel recommended parole, the first grant after 15 prior denials. RFK Jr. also supported release and a new investigation; most of the rest of the Kennedy family did not.

Pt 4 — Parole denied (Newsom reversal)

Follow-up after Governor Gavin Newsom reversed the board on 13 January 2022. Newsom’s stated grounds: the gravity of the crime, Sirhan’s shifting accounts over decades, and insufficient “insight” / acceptance of responsibility, which Newsom said left him a current public-safety risk. Groubert discusses why earlier hearings failed (counsel tried to relitigate guilt), the split inside the Kennedy family (RFK Jr. and Douglas vs. Ethel, Rory, Christopher and others), and the political setting of Newsom’s recall period. The hosts treat the reversal as political as well as legal. Sirhan was denied again in 2023 and remains incarcerated; later eligibility windows have also been denied.

RFK Assassination FBI Files Update [AUS Clips]

A later clip (2025) after additional FBI/RFK file releases. Groubert walks through names and links he found rather than claiming a single smoking-gun document. Topics include:

  • Dr. Ross Miller, one of the physicians who treated Kennedy that night; later family/CBS archive footage.
  • Sandra/Sandy Serrano’s account of a woman in a polka-dot dress and companions leaving via a fire escape shouting that they had shot Kennedy, and her subsequent interrogation by LAPD Special Unit Senator officers (Hank Hernandez and Manny Pena, described in the episode as intelligence-trained).
  • Other witnesses who reported people fleeing and an all-points bulletin for the polka-dot-dress woman.
  • Recap of autopsy (Thomas Noguchi: fatal wound from immediately behind), Sirhan’s distance in front of Kennedy according to pantry witnesses, extra-shot claims from audio analysis, and security guard Thane Eugene Cesar (behind Kennedy, armed with a .22).

The clip treats the new files as adding texture and connections, not as a closed proof of conspiracy or of sole guilt.

Across the videos, the hosts’ through-line is: Sirhan fired in the pantry and wounded people in front of him; the official case treated him as the lone assassin motivated by Kennedy’s Israel stance; Schrade, RFK Jr., and the hosts argue the fatal shot and some physical/audio evidence point to a second shooter (often Cesar in their telling) and a compromised investigation. Newsom and most of the Kennedy family reject that and treat Sirhan’s lack of a consistent, complete admission as disqualifying for parole. The series does not resolve the forensic dispute; it reports the 2021 grant, the 2022 veto, and later file snippets as unfinished business.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals