VoiceDDB
Politics • Culture • News
SAVE act
What the SAVE Act Would Mean for the Union If It Fails
August 21, 2026
post photo preview

What the SAVE Act Would Mean for the Union If It Fails

At least four GOP senators are opposing the SAVE Act, as is every Democrat. There are reasons why the four GOP senators oppose it, but there are reasons why every single Democrat opposes it too. As divisions go, it is not dissimilar to the U.S. Civil War and Lincoln’s fight. Lincoln had looked like he was losing his fight, but managed to get the numbers. What will it mean if SAVE is not passed?

Analysis depends on what has happened before. If we are in a condition of business as usual, then the SAVE Act means little, or is an overreach. In that scenario, Trump has a nefarious plan to remove Democrats from office and seize government control. If we are in a state of crisis—preceding even a stolen election in 2020 and multiple kill attempts on GOP figures, including Trump and Kirk—then SAVE would have to be very special.

Analysis changes depending on sources. Partisan, deep-state affiliates paid for with USAID over decades, Wikipedia, CNN, NYT et al. are claiming Trump has a nefarious plan with SAVE. And so, asking Grok, which has over-reliance on such sources, gets a ridiculous response:

“The comparison does not hold in any meaningful historical, moral, legal, or practical sense. The two events operate on entirely different scales of human impact, constitutional process, and national crisis.”

If one accepts that the 2020 election was stolen, that the COVID crisis was part of an administrative coup, that infiltration of social media by U.S. intelligence has allowed illegal overreach by the deep state, and that the SAVE Act could address electoral irregularities, then one sees the comparison with Civil War issues as comparable. How might Grok respond if it were even-handed and not captive?

Consider those opposing SAVE. They might want a puppet president who was voted in by 18% of counties. Maybe they have a personal enmity with Trump and want him killed? Maybe they want illegal aliens voting, vouching for each other? During the Civil War, awful people argued that “states’ rights” meant there had to be slavery. In the modern scene, states’ rights mean illegals can vote and identity is not required.

Significant members of the January 6th committee were pardoned in extraordinary fashion. And Hunter Biden’s pardon extended back before the Ukraine prosecutor being silenced or the shootdown of the Malaysian airliner. The circumstantial evidence pointing to a grand conspiracy by the deep state is deep. To accept business as usual is to be accepting the credibility of proven liars: Russia Gate, the Biden laptop, the COVID crisis allowing loser-voting rules, 2000 Mules, the bombs at the DNC and RNC, the impeachments on trumped-up evidence, Jack Smith, voting irregularities not investigated, activist judges, partisan news media, comics given work that cost millions simply for hating Trump.

The moral connection of slavery versus voting rights is pithy. The comparison of divided unions is apt. Why would Grok assume the pithy case and ignore the salient one?

If SAVE is not passed, it is likely enough that anti-Trumpers could take Congress and again impeach Trump on political lines, and that dangerous rhetoric would get GOP figures killed.

If it is passed, then people may be elected by voters. That might make a big difference.

= Absurd Grok Response =

The comparison does not hold in any meaningful historical, moral, legal, or practical sense. The two events operate on entirely different scales of human impact, constitutional process, and national crisis.

What actually happened with Lincoln and slavery

Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, as a wartime measure under his powers as commander-in-chief. It declared free the enslaved people in Confederate-held territory (roughly 3–4 million people), but it did not free those in Union-controlled areas or border states, and it depended on Union military success for enforcement.

The permanent, nationwide end of slavery came with the 13th Amendment, which Congress passed in January 1865 and the states ratified by December 1865. It constitutionally abolished slavery and involuntary servitude (except as punishment for crime) throughout the United States. This required:

  • A civil war that killed roughly 620,000–750,000 Americans.
  • Sustained political effort, including Lincoln’s lobbying of Congress.
  • A formal constitutional amendment process (two-thirds of both houses of Congress + three-fourths of the states).

Ending legal chattel slavery transformed the legal status of millions of human beings who had been treated as property. It was one of the most consequential acts in American history.

Status of the SAVE Act

The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act / SAVE America Act is ordinary legislation. Versions have passed the House multiple times (party-line or near party-line votes). It has repeatedly failed to advance in the Senate due to the filibuster (60-vote threshold) and opposition from some Republicans (notably Collins, Murkowski, McConnell, and Tillis on key votes) as well as all Democrats. As of August 2026 it remains unpassed and is not law.

Its core provisions require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship (passport, birth certificate, or equivalent) to register to vote in federal elections, along with related verification and photo-ID elements in some versions. Supporters describe it as enforcing existing law that only citizens may vote and as election-integrity reform. Critics (including voting-rights groups) argue it would create practical barriers for some eligible citizens who lack ready access to the required documents and compare its effects to historical voter-suppression tactics.

Why the parallel fails

AspectLincoln / End of SlaverySAVE Act
Scale of impactFreed millions from legal ownership as propertyAdministrative rules for voter registration
Human stakesLife, liberty, and legal personhoodAccess to the ballot under new documentation rules
ProcessCivil War + constitutional amendmentOrdinary statute blocked by Senate filibuster
Legal statusAchieved (13th Amendment is permanent)Not enacted
Moral weightEnding an institution of human bondageDebated election-administration reform
Historical consensusNear-universal recognition as transformativePartisan dispute; no equivalent consensus
 
 

Equating a contested voter-registration bill with the abolition of slavery collapses categories that are not comparable. One resolved a foundational moral and constitutional crisis through war and amendment. The other is a partisan legislative priority that has so far been unable to clear the Senate. Rhetoric that treats them as analogous inflates the stakes of ordinary electoral policy while diminishing the historical reality of slavery and emancipation.

In short: Lincoln’s actions ended the legal institution of slavery. The SAVE Act, even if it eventually passed, would change how Americans prove eligibility to register to vote. Those are not the same kind of event.

= Later Grok response = 

The comparison between the SAVE Act’s fate and Lincoln’s struggle over slavery remains strained even when examined from a position of maximum skepticism toward official narratives. Polarization, institutional distrust, and high-stakes fights over the rules of the republic are real. Equating a stalled voter-registration bill with the constitutional and moral crisis of chattel slavery, secession, and a war that killed hundreds of thousands does not follow from the available evidence.

Current facts on the SAVE Act

As of August 2026 the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act / SAVE America Act has passed the House multiple times on near party-line votes. It has repeatedly failed in the Senate. Four Republicans—Susan Collins (Maine), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), Mitch McConnell (Kentucky), and Thom Tillis (North Carolina)—joined every Democrat on key procedural and amendment votes that blocked it. Senate Majority Leader John Thune has stated the votes for cloture (60) are not there and has declined to eliminate the filibuster.

Stated reasons from the four senators center on federalism (states control the “times, places and manner” of elections under the Constitution), practical implementation (especially Murkowski on Alaska’s vast rural and Native communities, where obtaining documents could require expensive travel), and timing concerns before the midterms. McConnell and Tillis are retiring; Collins is seeking re-election. Democrats uniformly call it voter suppression or “Jim Crow 2.0.” Supporters, including Trump, frame it as enforcing the existing legal requirement that only citizens vote and as a response to perceived vulnerabilities.

Non-citizen voting: the empirical record

Federal law already prohibits non-citizens from voting in federal elections; the penalty includes prison and immigration consequences. Documented cases exist but are rare. State audits, the Heritage Foundation’s own database of prosecuted election crimes, Brennan Center reviews, and recent trackers consistently show dozens to low hundreds of confirmed or highly likely non-citizen registrations/votes across decades and hundreds of millions of ballots—typically fractions of a percent or far less.

Older academic claims of higher rates (e.g., a contested 2014 Stanford paper) have not been borne out by official cross-checks of voter rolls against citizenship databases. Recent Census Bureau matching efforts have flagged larger preliminary numbers in incomplete analyses, but these remain contested and do not demonstrate coordinated outcome-altering fraud. The principle that only citizens should vote is sound and widely supported in polling; whether documentary proof at registration is the optimal, least-burdensome way to enforce it is a separate policy question involving trade-offs for citizens who lack easy access to passports or certified birth certificates (elderly, poor, rural, married women with name changes, etc.).

The Civil War / Lincoln analogy

Lincoln faced an actual rupture of the Union, a war, and the legal ownership of millions of human beings. The Emancipation Proclamation was a wartime measure; the 13th Amendment required a constitutional process amid existential conflict. Even granting every strong claim about 2020 irregularities, media bias, intelligence community overreach, Russia Gate flaws, the Hunter Biden laptop suppression, COVID-era administrative expansions, or assassination attempts, the scale and character differ. Polarization and institutional distrust are severe. They are not the same as secession and slavery.

Charlie Kirk was assassinated in September 2025 while speaking at a university; prosecutors have pointed to political animus in the charging documents (engraved bullet, texts about “hatred”). Trump survived multiple attempts. Political violence and eliminationist rhetoric are real and condemnable from any direction. They do not automatically convert a documentation requirement for voter registration into the moral or historical equivalent of ending slavery.

What non-passage actually means

If the SAVE Act remains blocked:

  • Existing law (citizenship required) continues.
  • States retain primary control over registration and verification methods; some already require stronger proof or conduct regular clean-ups.
  • Claims of systemic non-citizen voting sufficient to swing national outcomes remain unproven by the audits and prosecutions that have occurred.
  • Partisan distrust deepens. Trump and allies will treat the failure as evidence of elite resistance to accountability; opponents will treat the push as evidence of an effort to suppress turnout.
  • Midterm and future elections proceed under the status-quo rules. Impeachment, investigation, and rhetorical escalation remain possible tools for whichever side holds institutional power—tools that have already been used aggressively in recent years.

Passage would standardize documentary proof of citizenship for federal registration and related verification steps. It would likely reduce the already-small number of improper non-citizen registrations at the cost of new administrative hurdles for some eligible citizens. It would not by itself “guarantee” future elections or prevent other forms of dispute (mail rules, drop boxes, ballot curing, legal challenges, media narratives). It also would not erase deeper sources of distrust: intelligence community involvement in domestic politics, selective prosecution perceptions, or activist judicial intervention.

On sources and “captivity”

Distrust of legacy media, certain intelligence assessments, and institutional self-reporting is earned on multiple recent episodes (Steele dossier problems, laptop suppression, shifting COVID guidance, uneven treatment of political violence). That does not license treating every contested claim as proven conspiracy or every counter-claim as deep-state propaganda. Courts, bipartisan election officials, state audits, and the absence of successful outcome-changing litigation after 2020 remain relevant data points. Extraordinary claims about a fully stolen election or an administrative coup require correspondingly strong, publicly verifiable evidence; much of what circulates remains assertion, selective data, or disputed interpretation.

An even-handed assessment does not require accepting the “business as usual / Trump is the threat” frame or the “stolen election / existential crisis” frame as settled fact. It requires weighing the documented incidence of the specific problem the SAVE Act targets, the constitutional allocation of election authority, the practical burdens of the proposed remedy, and the actual (not imagined) consequences of the current stalemate. Polarization is dangerous. Treating ordinary legislative disagreement as the moral equivalent of the Civil War escalates rather than clarifies it.

 

community logo
Join the VoiceDDB Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
00:01:07
November 27, 2022
Jingle Bell Rock

Jingle bell, jingle bell, jingle bell rock
Jingle bells swing and jingle bells ring
Snowin' and blowin' up bushels of fun
Now the jingle hop has begun

Jingle bell, jingle bell, jingle bell rock
Jingle bells chime in jingle bell time
Dancin' and prancin' in Jingle Bell Square
In the frosty air

What a bright time, it's the right time
To rock the night away
Jingle bell time is a swell time
To go glidin' in a one-horse sleigh

Giddy-up jingle horse, pick up your feet
Jingle around the clock
Mix and a-mingle in the jinglin' feet
That's the jingle bell rock

Jingle bell, jingle bell, jingle bell rock
Jingle bell chime in jingle bell time
Dancin' and prancin' in Jingle Bell Square
In the frosty air

What a bright time, it's the right time
To rock the night away
Jingle bell time is a swell time
To go glidin' in a one-horse sleigh

Giddy-up jingle horse, pick up your feet
Jingle around the clock
Mix and a-mingle in the jinglin' feet
That's the jingle bell
That's the jingle bell
That's the jingle...

00:02:04
September 01, 2021
Intro to Locals for the Conservative Voice

David Daniel Ball calls himself the Conservative Voice.

I'm a teacher with three decades experience teaching math to high school kids.I also work with first graders and kids in between first grade and high school. I know the legends of why Hypatia's dad is remembered through his contribution to Math theory. And I know the legend of why followers of Godel had thought he had disproved God's existence.

I'm not a preacher, but I am a Christian who has written over 28 books all of which include some reference to my faith. Twelve blog books on world history and current affairs, detailing world events , births and marriages on each day of the year, organised by month. Twelve books on the background to and history of Bible Quotes. One Bible quote per day for a year. An intro to a science fiction series I'm planning, post apocalyptic cyber punk. An autobiography with short story collections.

I'm known in Australia for my failure as a whistleblower over the negligence death of a school boy. ...

00:01:50
September 04, 2026
Should violent criminals be made fat? Grok says 'no'

No. Transferring gut bacteria from an obese person into a violent criminal is not a reliable, ethical, or effective way to make them “fat, sedentary, and less of a physical threat.”

The science does not deliver the outcome you want

Mouse studies in germ-free animals showed that microbiota from obese donors can increase energy harvest and adiposity compared with lean-donor microbiota. That is the origin of the idea. Human evidence is far weaker.

Randomized trials of fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) from lean donors into people with obesity have generally failed to produce meaningful, sustained weight loss. Microbiome composition can change; body weight and metabolic markers often do not, or the effects are small and inconsistent. Diet and the existing gut environment usually dominate. A 2025 Nature paper found diet outperformed microbial transplant for microbiome recovery. Human guts are already colonized, not sterile like lab mice, so engraftment is variable and effects unpredictable.

It is not a ...

post photo preview
August 28, 2026
Pfizer struggles to answer

Some in Australia are brilliant. Malcolm Roberts Investigates Pfizer over Covid vaccine.

Holiday break is over back to work tonight

Tonight I'll start double posting until I've caught up.

post photo preview
Miracle of Myeongnyang
October 26th

Miracle of Myeongnyang

Battle of Myeongnyang (October 26, 1597), part of the Imjin War (Japanese invasions of Korea, 1592–1598).

Lead-up

The Imjin War began in 1592 when Toyotomi Hideyoshi launched a large-scale invasion of Joseon Korea as a stepping stone toward Ming China. Japanese land forces advanced rapidly, but Joseon Admiral Yi Sun-sin repeatedly disrupted their supply lines with naval victories, using sturdy panokseon warships (and the armored turtle ships/geobukseon he helped develop). These successes helped stall the first invasion and contributed to a temporary truce/negotiations around 1596.

In 1597, Hideyoshi ordered a second invasion (the Chongyu War). Japanese agents spread disinformation that led the Joseon court to arrest, demote, and nearly execute Yi Sun-sin on charges of disloyalty and failure to attack. He was replaced by the less competent Wŏn Kyun (Won Gyun). In the Battle of Chilcheollyang (late August 1597), Wŏn Kyun led most of the Joseon fleet into a Japanese trap; nearly the entire force (around 200 ships) was destroyed, and Wŏn Kyun was killed. Only about 13 panokseon survived, largely because a subordinate (Bae Seol) held them back.

With the Joseon navy effectively shattered, King Seonjo hurriedly reinstated Yi Sun-sin as commander. He inherited a demoralized remnant of roughly 13 warships and a few hundred men. Japanese naval forces, now dominant, prepared to support a renewed land push northward toward Hanyang (Seoul) by clearing the western sea routes and Yellow Sea. Yi rejected advice to abandon the navy and join the army; he chose instead to make a stand in the narrow, tidal Myeongnyang Strait near Jindo Island (southwest Korea). The strait’s strong, reversing currents (up to ~10–11 knots) and constrained waters could negate Japanese numerical superiority and favor Joseon ranged gunnery over Japanese boarding tactics.

The Battle

On October 26, 1597 (lunar calendar dates vary slightly in sources), Yi positioned his small squadron at the northern entrance near Usuyeong. Japanese commanders including Kurushima Michifusa, Tōdō Takatora, Katō Yoshiaki, Wakizaka Yasuharu, and others advanced with a large fleet—Korean sources typically cite ~120–133 warships engaged (with totals sometimes listed up to ~300+ including support vessels). Yi’s diary and records note earlier scouting activity and a decision to draw the enemy into the strait.

Yi led from the front with his flagship, engaging the Japanese vanguard while some of his captains initially hesitated. Japanese ships funneled into the narrow channel. As the tide reversed, it swept vessels into disorder, causing collisions and loss of formation. Joseon ships used cannons, arrows, and ramming effectively at close range. Kurushima Michifusa was killed (his head later displayed as a warning); Tōdō Takatora was wounded. The Japanese could not exploit their numbers or preferred boarding tactics. After hours of fighting, they withdrew. Joseon lost no ships (minimal casualties, a handful of killed/wounded on Yi’s flagship and nearby vessels). Japanese losses were roughly 31 warships sunk or crippled, with additional damage and significant personnel losses (higher figures appear in some Korean accounts).

Results and Significance

The victory halted the Japanese naval advance supporting their land campaign, denied them reliable western sea supply routes, and preserved Joseon control of key waters. It allowed time to rebuild the navy (Yi later expanded his fleet) and contributed to the overall stalemate and eventual Japanese withdrawal after Hideyoshi’s death in 1598. Strategically, it was a “last stand” that turned the tide of the naval war in the second invasion. It is often called the “Miracle of Myeongnyang” and ranks among the most one-sided naval victories against overwhelming odds in history.

Yi Sun-sin was later killed at the Battle of Noryang (November/December 1598) while intercepting withdrawing Japanese forces; his last orders were reportedly not to announce his death to avoid demoralizing the fleet.

Significant Figures

  • Yi Sun-sin (Joseon): Supreme naval commander. A brilliant tactician and leader who had won multiple earlier battles. He studied local tides and geography, motivated demoralized crews, and directed the fight from the front. National hero in Korea; his war diary (Nanjung Ilgi) provides a key firsthand account.
  • Kurushima Michifusa (Japanese): Senior commander (daimyo-level naval leader from the Murakami suigun tradition). Killed in the battle—the highest-ranking Japanese death of the engagement—and his head was displayed. His loss disrupted command.
  • Tōdō Takatora (Japanese): Key commander in the second invasion’s naval efforts (involved in Chilcheollyang). Wounded at Myeongnyang.
  • Wŏn Kyun (Joseon): Yi’s temporary replacement whose catastrophic defeat at Chilcheollyang set the stage for the desperate defense.
  • Supporting Joseon officers: Kim Ŏkch’u, Kim Ŭngham, An Wi, Song Yŏchong, Pae Hŭngnip, and others who fought under Yi.
  • Broader context: Toyotomi Hideyoshi (Japanese supreme leader who ordered the invasions); King Seonjo of Joseon.

The battle exemplifies Yi’s use of terrain, tides, superior artillery, and leadership against superior numbers. Numbers of Japanese ships vary across sources (common range 133 warships engaged, higher totals including support craft), but the disparity and outcome are consistent in the historical record.

= October 26th 

These events are primarily associated with October 26 (with minor variations in some sources for a couple of dates). Here is a concise overview of each:

740 – Earthquake strikes Constantinople and surrounding areas.
A major earthquake (estimated magnitude around 7+ in some modern assessments) hit the vicinity of Constantinople and the Sea of Marmara on October 26, 740. It damaged or collapsed parts of the city’s land walls (Theodosian Walls), public buildings, and structures in nearby towns in Thrace and Asia Minor (including Nicaea/Nicomedia areas). Contemporary accounts (e.g., Theophanes) report over 1,000 deaths in the capital and describe the sea retreating then returning, consistent with a tsunami. Aftershocks continued for months.

1185 – Uprising of Asen and Peter begins.
On the feast day of St. Demetrius of Thessaloniki (October 26), brothers Peter (Theodore) and Asen launched a revolt of Bulgarians and Vlachs in the region of Moesia/the Haemus (Balkan Mountains) against Byzantine rule under Isaac II Angelos. Triggered by heavy taxation (including for the emperor’s wedding), they built a church to St. Demetrius in Tarnovo, claimed the saint’s favor had shifted to them, and proclaimed independence. This led to the restoration of Bulgarian statehood and the Second Bulgarian Empire under the Asen dynasty after several years of fighting.

1341 – Byzantine civil war of 1341–47 formally begins.
Following the death of Andronikos III and the overthrow of the regency of John Kantakouzenos (while he was away from the capital), his army proclaimed him emperor as John VI at Didymoteicho in Thrace on October 26, 1341. He accepted while still acknowledging the rights of the young John V Palaiologos. The resulting six-year civil war involved foreign allies (Turks, Serbs), devastated the empire, and ended with Kantakouzenos as co-emperor/senior ruler until 1354.

1377 – Tvrtko I is crowned the first king of Bosnia.
In the fall of 1377 (commonly dated to October 26, the feast of St. Demetrius), Ban Tvrtko I Kotromanić was crowned king of Bosnia (and claimed the title for the Serbs and other territories). He positioned himself as heir to the extinct Nemanjić dynasty of Serbia. The coronation site is debated (Mileševa Monastery in Serbian accounts vs. a Franciscan church at Mile in Bosnian/Croatian historiography). This elevated the Banate of Bosnia to a kingdom.

1520 – Charles V is crowned as Holy Roman Emperor.
Charles of Habsburg (already King of Spain as Charles I) was elected Holy Roman Emperor in June 1519. He was crowned King of the Romans / Emperor-elect in Aachen Cathedral on October 23, 1520 (some older lists approximate the date). The full papal imperial coronation by Pope Clement VII occurred later, in Bologna on February 24, 1530—the last such papal crowning. This marked the peak of Habsburg power under a ruler whose domains spanned much of Europe and the Americas.

1597 – Battle of Myeongnyang (Imjin War).
On October 26, 1597, Joseon Admiral Yi Sun-sin, with only about 13 panokseon warships remaining after earlier disasters, defeated a far larger Japanese fleet (Korean sources cite ~120–133 warships engaged, with totals up to ~300+ vessels including support craft) in the narrow Myeongnyang Strait near Jindo Island. Using the strong tidal currents, Yi’s forces sank or crippled roughly 30 Japanese ships (including killing a senior commander) with no Korean ships lost. This halted the Japanese naval advance supporting their land campaign toward the capital.

1640 – Treaty of Ripon is signed.
This truce ended the Second Bishops’ War between Charles I of England and the Scottish Covenanters. After Scottish victories and occupation of northern English territory (including Newcastle), the treaty (negotiated at Ripon; sources vary on exact signing between October 16–28, often cited around the 26th) provided for Scottish occupation of parts of northern England and daily payments (~£850) until a final settlement via the English Parliament. It forced Charles to summon the Long Parliament, a key step toward the English Civil War.

1689 – General Piccolomini burns Skopje.
Austrian general Enea Silvio Piccolomini (of Italian noble descent) captured Skopje during the Great Turkish War. On or around October 26, 1689, he ordered the city burned (the fire lasted two days), citing prevention of cholera spread, denial of resources to returning Ottoman forces, or inability to hold the distant city. Much of the city (population then ~60,000) was destroyed, reducing it to ~10,000 and ending its regional prominence. Piccolomini himself died of cholera soon afterward.

1774 – First Continental Congress adjourns in Philadelphia.
After meeting from September 5 at Carpenters’ Hall (delegates from 12 colonies responding to the Intolerable/Coercive Acts), the Congress adjourned on October 26. It had adopted the Articles of Association (economic boycott of Britain), issued the Declaration and Resolves asserting colonial rights, and planned to reconvene in May 1775 if grievances were not addressed. This was a major step in colonial unity short of declaring independence.

1775 – King George III addresses Parliament on the American rebellion.
Following the outbreak of fighting (Lexington/Concord, Bunker Hill) and the earlier Proclamation of Rebellion (August 23, 1775), George III addressed both houses of Parliament on October 27, 1775 (some lists date related actions to the 26th). He declared the colonies in open rebellion, rejected conciliatory approaches, and authorized military measures to suppress it, framing the conflict as an attempt to establish an independent empire.

1776 – Benjamin Franklin departs for France.
On October 26, 1776 (about a month after his appointment as one of the commissioners to France), the 70-year-old Franklin sailed from Philadelphia on the Reprisal. His mission was to secure formal French alliance, military aid, and recognition for the United States. He arrived in France later that year and, leveraging his fame as a scientist and statesman, played a central role in obtaining the 1778 treaties of alliance and commerce after the Saratoga victory.

These October 26 events span natural disasters, revolts and state-building in the Balkans and Byzantium, Habsburg imperial consolidation, a famous naval victory in East Asia, and key steps in the American Revolution. Dates can vary slightly by calendar system or source for a few of them.

Read full Article
post photo preview
St Crispin's Day Agincourt
October 25th

St Crispin's Day Agincourt

The Battle of Agincourt (25 October 1415) was a decisive English victory in the Hundred Years’ War. An exhausted, outnumbered English army under Henry V defeated a much larger French force on a narrow, muddy field near the village of Agincourt (Azincourt) in northern France.

Lead-up and campaign

Henry V (king since 1413) revived the English claim to the French throne, based on descent from Edward III through the female line. Negotiations with the French court failed in 1414–15. Henry assembled a large expeditionary army (roughly 11,000–12,000 men, including a high proportion of longbowmen) and sailed from Southampton on 11 August 1415.

The primary target was the fortified port of Harfleur at the mouth of the Seine. The siege began in mid-August and lasted until the town surrendered on 22 September. It was costly: dysentery (the “bloody flux”) and other diseases killed or incapacitated a large part of the army—estimates suggest a quarter to a third of the force was lost or invalided home. Henry left a garrison in Harfleur and, with the remaining troops (commonly estimated at 6,000–9,000 fighting men, the majority archers), decided to march overland to the English-held port of Calais rather than risk further campaigning deep in France so late in the season.

The march was difficult. The French blocked river crossings on the Somme, forcing a longer route. By late October the English were tired, short of supplies, and outnumbered when a large French army under the Constable of France intercepted them near Agincourt, blocking the road to Calais.

The battle

The English took up a defensive position on a recently ploughed field between two woods (Agincourt and Tramecourt). The frontage was narrow (roughly 700–1,000 yards at its tightest), which limited the ability of the larger French army to bring its full numbers to bear at once. Heavy rain had turned the ground into deep mud.

Henry organised his force with dismounted men-at-arms in the centre and wedges of longbowmen on the flanks (and sometimes interspersed). The archers drove sharpened stakes into the ground in front of their positions as a defence against cavalry. The French, commanded primarily by Charles d’Albret (Constable of France) and Marshal Boucicaut, had planned a more cautious approach of surrounding and starving the English, but younger nobles insisted on a frontal attack.

On the morning of 25 October (Saint Crispin’s Day):

  • An initial French cavalry charge against the English archers largely failed. The muddy ground slowed the horses, the stakes disrupted the charge, and longbow volleys caused heavy losses.
  • The main French force of dismounted men-at-arms advanced across the mud in dense formations. Their heavy plate armour exhausted them; many sank into the mud. As the front ranks were stopped or killed, those behind pressed forward, creating a deadly crush in which men fell and were trampled.
  • English longbow fire continued to disrupt the French approach. When the French reached the English line, the lightly armoured archers joined the melee with swords, mallets, and other weapons, attacking the flanks and fallen men.
  • Henry himself fought in the hand-to-hand fighting. At one point, fearing a renewed French attack or a breakout by prisoners, he ordered the killing of many captives (a controversial act that violated normal chivalric practice).

The French third line largely did not engage or withdrew. The battle lasted a few hours and ended in a complete English victory.

Result and aftermath

Immediate outcome: English losses were light—commonly estimated at a few hundred (at least 112 named dead in some records, with higher contemporary figures around 400–600). French losses were catastrophic: roughly 6,000–10,000 dead (many of them nobles), plus hundreds to over a thousand high-ranking prisoners. Among the French dead were the Constable Charles d’Albret, the Dukes of Alençon, Bar, and Brabant, and numerous counts and bannerets. Prominent prisoners included Charles, Duke of Orléans (held for 25 years), the Duke of Bourbon, and Marshal Boucicaut.

The English reached Calais a few days later. Henry returned to England in November and was received as a hero. The victory greatly strengthened the legitimacy of the Lancastrian dynasty and Henry’s personal prestige.

Longer-term consequences: The destruction of much of the French military and political leadership (especially the Armagnac faction) left France weakened and divided. It facilitated Henry’s later campaigns, the conquest of Normandy (1417–19), and the Treaty of Troyes (1420), under which Henry married Catherine of Valois and was recognised as heir and regent of France. English dominance in northern France lasted until the appearance of Joan of Arc and the lifting of the Siege of Orléans in 1429. Henry himself died in 1422 during the Siege of Meaux; his infant son became Henry VI.

Significant figures

English

  • Henry V: Commander and active participant in the fighting. The battle cemented his reputation.
  • Edward, Duke of York: Commanded part of the English centre; killed in the battle.
  • Michael de la Pole, Earl of Suffolk: Young earl killed (his father had died of dysentery at Harfleur).
  • Humphrey, Duke of Gloucester and Thomas, Duke of Clarence: Henry’s brothers; prominent in the campaign (Clarence at Harfleur).
  • Sir Thomas Erpingham: Experienced knight often associated with the archers.
  • Dafydd Gam: Welsh captain killed in the fighting.

French

  • Charles d’Albret (Constable of France): Senior commander; killed.
  • Marshal Boucicaut (Jean II le Meingre): Experienced soldier who favoured a more cautious strategy; captured and died in English captivity.
  • Charles, Duke of Orléans: Nephew of King Charles VI; captured and held for decades.
  • Dukes of Alençon, Bar, and Brabant: All killed.
  • King Charles VI: Absent due to mental illness; did not command.

The battle is most famous in English culture through Shakespeare’s Henry V (“We few, we happy few, we band of brothers…”), which dramatises the Saint Crispin’s Day speech and the victory.

= October 25th

October 25 (traditionally linked to the feast of Saints Crispin and Crispinian, and notably Saint Crispin’s Day) is associated with several significant historical events.

Saints Crispin and Crispinian (285/286)

Saints Crispin and Crispinian were early Christian martyrs (traditionally said to be brothers from a noble Roman family) who worked as shoemakers while preaching in Soissons (Gaul). According to legend, during the Diocletianic Persecution they were tortured under the governor Rictius (or Rictiovarus) Varus—including being stretched on the rack, having strips of flesh cut, and awls driven under their nails—then thrown into the river Aisne with millstones around their necks. They miraculously survived drowning and fire before being beheaded on the orders of co-emperor Maximian (or Diocletian). Their feast day is 25 October. They became the patron saints of shoemakers, cobblers, curriers, tanners, leather workers, and related trades. Their story is largely legendary (with some historians noting inconsistencies with the timeline of persecutions in Gaul), but they were widely venerated in medieval Europe, especially by craft guilds. The date is also famous in English culture because of the Battle of Agincourt.

Emperor Leo I acclaims Leo II as Caesar (473)

On or around this date in 473, Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Emperor Leo I elevated his young grandson Leo II (son of the Isaurian general Zeno and Leo I’s daughter Ariadne) to the rank of Caesar, marking him as heir. Leo II was later promoted to co-emperor (Augustus) in November 473 and briefly ruled as sole emperor after Leo I’s death in January 474 before dying himself later that year (age about 7). Chronological details of his elevation to Caesar vary slightly in sources (some place aspects in 472 or link them to other events), but the traditional association is with October 473.

Second Crusade events (1147)

  • Battle of Dorylaeum: In late October 1147 (intensifying around 25 October), the German contingent of the Second Crusade under Conrad III of Germany was defeated by Seljuk Turkish forces under Sultan Mesud I near Dorylaeum (modern Eskişehir, Turkey). After advancing beyond Dorylaeum, the German army faced repeated Turkish attacks during a retreat that turned into a rout. Conrad was wounded by arrows, and the Germans suffered heavy losses (contemporary claims of catastrophic percentages are exaggerated, but the force was badly mauled and largely unable to continue). This was a major early setback for the Second Crusade.
  • Siege of Lisbon: After a four-month siege (beginning 1 July), crusader forces from England, Flanders, the Rhineland and elsewhere, allied with King Afonso Henriques of Portugal, forced the surrender of Lisbon from its Almoravid (Muslim) rulers. The city formally fell around 24–25 October 1147. This was one of the few lasting Christian successes of the broader Second Crusade period and a major step in the Portuguese Reconquista, securing the Tagus and helping establish Portugal’s strategic position.

Battle of Agincourt (1415)

On Saint Crispin’s Day, 25 October 1415, during the Hundred Years’ War, the English army under Henry V (roughly 6,000–9,000 men, including a large proportion of longbowmen and relatively lightly armoured infantry) decisively defeated a much larger French force (estimates commonly 12,000–20,000+ men-at-arms and others, with heavy cavalry) near Agincourt (Azincourt) in northern France. The muddy, narrow field, French tactical errors (including a frontal assault by heavily armoured knights), and the effectiveness of the English longbow led to a crushing English victory with relatively light English casualties and very heavy French losses among the nobility. The battle is immortalised in Shakespeare’s Henry V (“We few, we happy few, we band of brothers…”).

Dirk Hartog landfall in Australia (1616)

On 25 October 1616, Dutch East India Company (VOC) captain Dirk Hartog, commanding the ship Eendracht, made landfall on an uninhabited island off the west coast of Australia (now Dirk Hartog Island in Shark Bay, Western Australia). This was the second recorded European landing on the Australian continent (after Willem Janszoon in 1606) and the first on the western coast. Hartog left a flattened pewter plate inscribed with details of the visit nailed to a post at Cape Inscription—the oldest physical European artefact from Australia. He charted part of the western coastline (naming the region Eendrachtsland after his ship) before continuing to Batavia.

Second Battle of Cape Finisterre (1747)

On 25 October 1747 (14 October Old Style / Julian calendar then used in Britain), during the War of the Austrian Succession, a British fleet of 14 ships of the line under Rear-Admiral Edward Hawke intercepted and defeated a French convoy of ~250 merchant ships protected by 8 ships of the line under Henri-François des Herbiers. The British captured six French warships and thousands of seamen (with only a handful of merchant ships taken). The victory severely disrupted French Atlantic commerce and colonial supply for the remainder of the war.

Accession of George III (1760)

On 25 October 1760, George II died suddenly (of aortic dissection) at Kensington Palace. His grandson, George III (George William Frederick, born 1738 in England—the first Hanoverian king born in Britain and whose first language was English), succeeded as King of Great Britain and Ireland and Elector of Hanover. George III reigned until 1820, a period that included the end of the Seven Years’ War, the American Revolution, and the Napoleonic Wars.

These events illustrate how 25 October has been a date of martyrdom, imperial succession, crusading campaigns, decisive battles, early European contact with Australia, naval warfare, and a British royal succession.

Read full Article
October 22, 2026
post photo preview
Modern states came into being
October 24th

Modern states came into being

The Peace of Westphalia (24 October 1648) ended the Thirty Years’ War in the Holy Roman Empire and the related phase of the Eighty Years’ War between Spain and the Dutch Republic. It consisted primarily of the Treaty of Münster (between the Emperor and France and their allies) and the Treaty of Osnabrück (between the Emperor and Sweden and their allies), signed the same day in the Westphalian cities of Münster and Osnabrück. A separate Spanish–Dutch treaty had been signed earlier that year (30 January 1648).

Lead-up: The Thirty Years’ War

The war (1618–1648) began as a conflict within the Holy Roman Empire over religion and imperial authority and expanded into a broader European struggle involving dynastic, territorial, and balance-of-power motives.

It was triggered by the Defenestration of Prague (1618), when Protestant Bohemian nobles threw Habsburg officials out of a window in protest against efforts to reverse Protestant gains. This led to the election of the Calvinist Elector Frederick V of the Palatinate as King of Bohemia, which the Catholic Habsburg Emperor Ferdinand II suppressed with Spanish and Bavarian help (Battle of White Mountain, 1620). The war then drew in Denmark (1625–1629), Sweden under Gustavus Adolphus (from 1630; he was killed at Lützen in 1632), and finally Catholic France under Cardinal Richelieu (openly from 1635), which intervened to weaken the Habsburgs despite sharing their religion.

The conflict devastated large parts of Germany through fighting, famine, and disease. Population losses in the Empire are estimated in the millions (modern scholarship often places total deaths in the 4.5–8 million range across the war’s theatres). By the 1640s both sides were exhausted. Preliminary talks and a Franco-Swedish agreement in 1641 set the stage for a general congress; formal negotiations opened in Münster and Osnabrück in 1643–1644, with fighting continuing in parallel to improve bargaining positions. Emperor Ferdinand II had died in 1637; his son Ferdinand III (r. 1637–1657) faced a deteriorating military situation and was forced to negotiate seriously.

The Negotiations and Signing

Talks were complex and protracted. More than 100 delegations represented the Emperor, France, Sweden, Spain, the Dutch, numerous German princes and free cities, and others (England, Poland, Russia, and the Ottomans were not present). Catholic powers largely met in Münster; Protestant ones in Osnabrück. The papal nuncio Fabio Chigi (later Pope Alexander VII) and the Venetian envoy Alvise Contarini acted as mediators.

Key negotiators included:

  • Imperial side: Count Maximilian von Trauttmansdorff (chief plenipotentiary, widely credited with driving the process to a conclusion), assisted by figures such as Johann Ludwig von Nassau-Hadamar and Isaak Volmar.
  • France: Henri II d’Orléans, Duke of Longueville (nominal head), with Claude de Mesmes, Count d’Avaux, and Abel Servien as the principal diplomats.
  • Sweden: Count Johan Oxenstierna (son of the Swedish chancellor Axel Oxenstierna) and Johan Adler Salvius.
  • Spain: Gaspar de Bracamonte y Guzmán and others.
  • Brandenburg and other German states sent their own envoys; Johann von Sayn-Wittgenstein was prominent among the Protestants.

The treaties were signed on 24 October 1648.

Results and Terms

The settlement combined territorial adjustments, religious arrangements, and constitutional changes within the Empire:

  • Territorial gains: Sweden received Western Pomerania (including Stettin), Wismar, and the secularized bishoprics of Bremen and Verden, giving it control of key Baltic and North Sea river mouths and a seat in the Imperial Diet. France gained the Décapole cities in Alsace (with exceptions) and confirmation of Metz, Toul, and Verdun, strengthening its Rhine frontier. Brandenburg obtained Eastern Pomerania and several secularized bishoprics (and the reversion of Magdeburg). Bavaria kept the Upper Palatinate and its electoral title; the Rhenish Palatinate was restored to Frederick V’s son Charles Louis with a new (eighth) electoral vote.
  • Religious settlement: The Peace of Augsburg (1555) was reaffirmed and extended. The principle of cuius regio, eius religio continued, but Calvinism was now recognized alongside Catholicism and Lutheranism. The normal year for determining religious possession was set at 1 January 1624. Forced emigration was restricted, and confessional parity was introduced in certain Imperial institutions.
  • Independence and sovereignty: The Dutch Republic’s independence from Spain was confirmed, ending the Eighty Years’ War. The Swiss Confederation’s independence from the Empire was recognized. The Imperial estates (German princes and free cities) received greater autonomy, including the right to form alliances (with limits) and more control over their internal affairs; the Emperor’s ability to act unilaterally in the Empire was curtailed.
  • Other: Amnesties, restitution rules, and demobilization arrangements were included. France and Sweden became guarantors of the Imperial constitution.

France and Spain continued fighting until the Peace of the Pyrenees (1659). The war’s demographic and economic costs in Germany were severe, though modern estimates are lower than older claims of near-total ruin.

Significance and Legacy

The Peace is traditionally viewed as a landmark in the development of the modern European state system—emphasizing the sovereignty of territorial states, the principle of non-interference in internal affairs, and a shift away from religiously defined universal authority toward a balance-of-power order. Within the Empire it confirmed the fragmentation of authority among hundreds of semi-sovereign entities, limiting Habsburg centralization. Historians debate the precise extent of the “Westphalian system” as a clean break, but the treaties remain a foundational reference point in the history of international relations.

The settlement closed one of the most destructive conflicts in European history and redrew the map of Central Europe for the remainder of the early modern period.

= October 24th

These are all events associated with October 24 in various years.

AD 69 – Second Battle of Bedriacum (also called the Second Battle of Cremona)

During the Year of the Four Emperors, forces loyal to Vespasian (led by Marcus Antonius Primus, commanding Danube/Pannonian and Moesian legions including Legio III Gallica, VII Galbiana, VII Claudia, VIII Augusta, and XIII Gemina) defeated the forces of Emperor Vitellius near Bedriacum (modern Calvatone) in northern Italy, between Bedriacum and Cremona.

Vitellius had sent Aulus Caecina Alienus with a strong army (including XXI Rapax, V Alaudae, I Italica, XXII Primigenia and others), but Caecina’s attempted defection left the Vitellians effectively leaderless. Fighting began on 24 October with a cavalry clash; the main battle raged through the night. At dawn, the III Gallica (which had served in the East) saluted the rising sun in their adopted custom; the Vitellians mistook this for the arrival of eastern reinforcements and broke. The Flavian victory opened the way to Cremona (which was stormed and sacked) and ultimately to Rome, where Vitellius was soon killed. Vespasian became undisputed emperor.

1260 – Dedication of Chartres Cathedral

The Gothic Cathedral of Our Lady of Chartres (Notre-Dame de Chartres) in France was dedicated in the presence of King Louis IX (Saint Louis). The cathedral had been rebuilt after a major fire in 1194 that destroyed most of the previous Romanesque structure (though the west front, Royal Portal, and crypt survived). Construction of the High Gothic building proceeded rapidly; the main fabric was largely complete within about 30 years. It is renowned for its architecture, sculpture, and nearly complete ensemble of 12th- and 13th-century stained glass, and it has been a UNESCO World Heritage Site since 1979.

1360 – Treaty of Brétigny (Treaty of Calais) ratified

The Treaty of Brétigny (drafted 8 May 1360 near Chartres) was ratified at Calais on 24 October 1360 between Edward III of England and John II of France. It ended the first phase of the Hundred Years’ War. Edward renounced his claim to the French throne in exchange for large territories in southwestern France (Aquitaine/Guyenne and associated regions) held in full sovereignty, plus a massive ransom for the captive John II. France later repudiated the treaty under Charles V, and the war resumed.

1590 – John White returns from Roanoke

John White, governor of the second Roanoke Colony (the “Lost Colony”), returned to England (Plymouth) on 24 October after an unsuccessful search. He had left the colonists in 1587 and was delayed by the Spanish Armada crisis. Arriving at Roanoke on 18 August 1590 (his granddaughter Virginia Dare’s third birthday), he found the settlement abandoned. The only clues were “CRO” carved on a tree and “CROATOAN” on a palisade post—indicating, in White’s view, that the settlers had moved to Croatoan (likely modern Hatteras Island) to join the friendly Croatoan people. Bad weather prevented further search, and the fate of the colonists remains a mystery.

1605 – Accession/Coronation of Jahangir

Nur-ud-Din Muhammad Salim, eldest son of Emperor Akbar, ascended the Mughal throne in Agra as Emperor Jahangir (“Conqueror of the World”) after his father’s death. Contemporary sources, including Jahangir’s own memoirs, place the accession around 24 October 1605 (some modern lists give 3 or 24 November depending on calendar conventions). He ruled until 1627 and is noted for his patronage of the arts (especially miniature painting), his memoirs (Jahangirnama), and the cultural flourishing of the Mughal court, despite later political intrigues and his son Khusrau’s rebellion.

1641 – Proclamation of Dungannon

Sir Phelim (Felim) O’Neill of Kinard, a leader of the Irish Rebellion that had begun the previous day, issued the Proclamation of Dungannon. It justified the uprising as a defense of the rights and liberty of the native Irish and of Catholics, while declaring continued loyalty to King Charles I and denying any intent to harm the king or his English and Scottish subjects. O’Neill claimed (falsely, according to later historical consensus) to hold a royal commission authorizing the action against Protestant opponents of the king. The proclamation helped frame the rebellion politically and contributed to its spread into the Irish Confederate Wars.

1648 – Peace of Westphalia signed

The Peace of Westphalia (Treaties of Münster and Osnabrück) was signed on 24 October 1648, ending the Thirty Years’ War (1618–1648) in the Holy Roman Empire and the related phase of the Eighty Years’ War between Spain and the Dutch. Negotiated in the Westphalian cities of Münster and Osnabrück, the settlements involved the Holy Roman Emperor, German princes, France, Sweden, and others. Key outcomes included territorial adjustments, recognition of the independence of the Dutch Republic and Swiss Confederation, and greater autonomy for the states of the Empire (including religious rights under an expanded cuius regio, eius religio principle). It is often cited as a foundational moment in the development of the modern system of sovereign states.

1795 – Third Partition of Poland

Representatives of Austria, Prussia, and Russia agreed on 24 October 1795 to the Third Partition of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, completely erasing the remaining independent Polish state. This followed the suppression of the Kościuszko Uprising (1794). Russia, Prussia, and Austria divided the residual territory (roughly: Russia took eastern Lithuania and other areas; Prussia gained Warsaw and surrounding districts; Austria received western Galicia and southern Masovia). King Stanisław August Poniatowski was forced to abdicate. Poland did not regain full independence until 1918.

These events span Roman civil war, medieval cathedral building and diplomacy, early English colonization, Mughal succession, the Irish Rebellion, the end of the Thirty Years’ War, and the final erasure of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals