VoiceDDB
Politics • Culture • News
oDDBall analysis of conservative politics with a libertarian economic conservative twist. Small government, big freedom.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
September 27, 2021
On this day, 27th Sept 2016

My preferences for Redgum Ward. I have placed sitting councillors last. It won't mean much. There are about thirteen thousand voters in this ward spread across Keysborough, South Dandenong and the CBD and I'm not letter dropping or handing out how to vote cards. Media are waiting until the last week to run articles on the election and may be restricting candidate letters to the editor. At the end of the day, it is about spending too much money, fetters on local business and garbage collection. The left dominated council are very bad on these fronts. But I'm playing a long game. I want a coherent platform this election so in four years time I will be known. And maybe I can get important issues addressed in the mean time. Car parks. Cheaper, more efficient waste disposal. Better public transport bussing vectors. Less red tape on business. Better youth employment. Better planning so that there are facilities for places of worship and recreation. Better infrastructure for internet. Council aren't responsible for all of that, but they have input in all of that.

Hillary was slippery and offered nothing beyond confusion and excuses. It was made all about Trump. He did not make a gaff. He made valid points Hillary danced around. Sky News in Australia gave it to Hillary too. But Trump did not fail. Did not try to be something he wasn't. Did not appear as Hillary portrays him. In my view, Hillary lost because she failed to slam him shut. The public had low expectations of Trump. He exceeded that. He did not joke as Reagan did about exploiting his opponents youth and innocence. He did not hurt Hillary. He let her shriek, and took the high ground.

Hillary's reply to Trump's claim the budget could be $5 trillion better off was telling. "I was confused by what you offered. I have considered that. It would not offer those savings." She has no hope for America. No plan. Hillary was belled placing a lie on Trump several times. The moderator rushed to prevent Trump from addressing them. But he calmly replied. Hillary's track record is that of failure and murderous incompetence. She stands on her record.

The left wing media pieces were written before the debate. They knew they needed to have to have something to promote Hillary. Hillary gave them nothing in the debate to endorse her. Making up a meme about Trump not shaking a hand when he clearly did just shows they are using the same play sheet.

Hillary has tremendous stamina. Her sustained poor judgement spans decades. Trump could never hope to rival it. Ordinary people would be sacked and jailed had they done merely one thing Hillary has done every year of her public career. Beginning with almost imploding the case against Nixon on Watergate through corruption.

Kevin Rudd has a lot of experience with this. He tried very hard to turn Australia into a toilet.

Did it happen to mention what she said? I am not disputing the assertion that Emma Watson has left wing values. I just would like to judge what she has said by what she has said. I tire of journalists reporting only their opinion.

The Vote Compass question was so bad, so engineered for a result, I refused to use it. Naturally Penny relies on this six year old device of the left.

All Turnbull offers as leader of the Liberals is further humiliation before his resignation. He seems keen to leave a lodestone memory.

Ken Henry has no credibility. He would only oppose spending if the government was conservative. It is not the principle, but the tribe. In fact, Australia spends too much and needed to cut spending when Rudd was PM too.

It is not the first time Obama has promoted a policy that runs counter to reality or the interests of the United States. Hillary wants to continue that work.

Trigger warnings are part and parcel with Safe Schooling. It would be better to raise them with wolves.

Hockey was underrated as treasurer, I believe because he was a stumbling block to Turnbull. Turnbull promised crossbenchers things would be different when he was PM. Not entirely a lie. Now that Turnbull is PM, the only similarity with Abbott's government is Abbott's policies are rebadged and made worse so as to promote Turnbull. What Australia really needs is work choices.

Birmingham has no idea about schooling, based on what he has said, quoted here. Private schools are subsidised by the taxpayer, but if they were to be closed, and students shifted to the public purse, the government could not afford the cost. We need private schools, and they need some public money. Parents using private schools are subsidising public school children too. They should. They do. Safe Schools is evil. Children do not benefit from the program but are exploited by it. They are not safe with it operating. But some adults get sexual pleasure from exploiting all children with Safe Schools. Those adults made choices as adults and are now forcing students to make choices about things they are not equipped through nature to deal with. However, if the Liberals support it, then the program will have bipartisan support because the ALP are corrupt and venal and care nothing for Australia or her children

I don't agree with what Pauline Hanson says, or Lambie, very often. I don't mind them saying it, I can debate their points. But I wish there was someone who could be an advocate for me. For economic conservative favouring Libertarian values (except on religion or drugs). Yet so many so called Christian Conservatives are all over the place. Abbott spoke sense but was undermined by Turnbull and had to do some defensive things so as to not get rolled. Turnbull just takes me for granted. Turnbull is a classic tax and spend left winger. He is big government favouring, and he has contempt for basic freedoms required for a free democratic state to prosper. And then we have Shorten campaigning for corruption. And if Shorten gets rolled it will be by another who feels they can better wield slush funds and exploit. It is telling that a whistleblower like Kathy Jackson is being persecuted by those who accepted her predecessor doing worse.

Clinton has stamina and staying power. Few people could have such sustained bad decision making. Most would have been sacked after their first error. The doormat can set up a slush fund and avoid scrutiny through an illegally established email server that was a security risk. And when she was found out, she had her people smash the phones with hammers. But she can say 'personal income tax because when she was secretary of state, voters personal income tax were vetted by the IRS if they were conservative.

https://conservativeweasel.blogspot.com/2021/09/27th-sept-review-of-historical-and.html

post photo preview
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
00:01:07
November 27, 2022
Jingle Bell Rock

Jingle bell, jingle bell, jingle bell rock
Jingle bells swing and jingle bells ring
Snowin' and blowin' up bushels of fun
Now the jingle hop has begun

Jingle bell, jingle bell, jingle bell rock
Jingle bells chime in jingle bell time
Dancin' and prancin' in Jingle Bell Square
In the frosty air

What a bright time, it's the right time
To rock the night away
Jingle bell time is a swell time
To go glidin' in a one-horse sleigh

Giddy-up jingle horse, pick up your feet
Jingle around the clock
Mix and a-mingle in the jinglin' feet
That's the jingle bell rock

Jingle bell, jingle bell, jingle bell rock
Jingle bell chime in jingle bell time
Dancin' and prancin' in Jingle Bell Square
In the frosty air

What a bright time, it's the right time
To rock the night away
Jingle bell time is a swell time
To go glidin' in a one-horse sleigh

Giddy-up jingle horse, pick up your feet
Jingle around the clock
Mix and a-mingle in the jinglin' feet
That's the jingle bell
That's the jingle bell
That's the jingle...

00:02:04
September 01, 2021
Intro to Locals for the Conservative Voice

David Daniel Ball calls himself the Conservative Voice.

I'm a teacher with three decades experience teaching math to high school kids.I also work with first graders and kids in between first grade and high school. I know the legends of why Hypatia's dad is remembered through his contribution to Math theory. And I know the legend of why followers of Godel had thought he had disproved God's existence.

I'm not a preacher, but I am a Christian who has written over 28 books all of which include some reference to my faith. Twelve blog books on world history and current affairs, detailing world events , births and marriages on each day of the year, organised by month. Twelve books on the background to and history of Bible Quotes. One Bible quote per day for a year. An intro to a science fiction series I'm planning, post apocalyptic cyber punk. An autobiography with short story collections.

I'm known in Australia for my failure as a whistleblower over the negligence death of a school boy. ...

00:01:50
Editorial from 2018 for June 9th

Don't give up on hope. Western Civilisation is on the nose of universities in Australia. Sydney University collapsed in 1990, and her upper executive got replaced by ALP managerialists as Keating fought a culture war which the Liberal Party have not effectively engaged. Dame Kramer had been made Chancellor, but the Chancellor's position is not executive at Sydney University. Kramer fought effectively for Western Values, but the University, now, is as partisan left as the ABC is now. Kramer had been a powerful presence in charge of the ABC too. 

In 1990, Sydney University lost her Chancellor and Vice Chancellor. The Chancellor, Hermann David Black, died after a long illness. James Anthony Rowland, a former governor of NSW took the chancellor's position for a few years, before passing it to Kramer in 1991. She held on to 2001. From 1981 to 1990, John Manning Ward was the executive head of Sydney University as Vice Chancellor. He had been writing a trilogy on Australian conservative leaders ...

post photo preview
Sarah Palin wrote when Obama took office

We're in for a helluva' ride, America. Obama just named Susan Rice as his National Security Adviser and nominated Samantha Power to replace Rice as our U.N. ambassador. Samantha Power is married to Cass Sunstein, the very, very strange Obama pick for an early "czar" position who wowed us with his numerous bizarre claims including the wacko belief that animals should have the right to sue in court, that hunting should be banned as genocide, and that pet ownership is akin to “slavery.” But Mrs. Cass Sunstein’s character judgment in choosing her life partner is the least of America's worries. Information about Obama's new picks will be revealed in coming days. Pay attention to who they are; what they stand for; and what their records, associations, and statements reveal about them and their intentions. Especially consider Obama's chosen ones as evidence of his skewed thinking as he "fundamentally transforms" our great nation.

Here's just a taste, as summarized by The Daily Caller:

"In 2002, ...

Oxfam Lamb approach 2018

Oxfam lamb approached me at Dandenong mall. I was playing Pokémon Go. She said I was emailing her and I should face her instead. Lovely English accent. Blond. Blue eyed. I stopped and wished her a good day. She said “Stop. What if I were to ask you what was the deadliest danger children face today around the world? What might you say it is?” I replied “The UN preventing profit and condemning children to die without allowing parents the means to support themselves. But that is just me. I wish you a good day” and she stood with her mouth agape saying 'wow.'

post photo preview
post photo preview
Failed Corporate Leadership
The ABC, Honours, and Institutional Rot in Australia

Failed Corporate Leadership: The ABC, Honours, and Institutional Rot in Australia

Today, on King’s Birthday, Australians reflect on service and excellence as the 2026 Honours List is announced. Among the recipients is the late broadcaster James Valentine, awarded a Member of the Order of Australia (AM) for his contributions to media, music, and children’s literature. Valentine, the affable ABC Radio Sydney voice known for his wit and warmth, died in April 2026 at 64 after battling oesophageal cancer. The honour was presented to him and his family in a special ceremony before his death — a gesture that highlights both his public affection and the government’s awareness of his final months.

Valentine embodied quiet dignity. He was not a firebrand but carried himself with an everyman charm that disarmed listeners. Yet his career unfolded almost entirely within the ABC — an institution established by Robert Menzies to provide an independent voice, only to pivot into partisan opposition against him from the outset. For decades, the ABC has operated without robust editorial standards, subtly advancing certain worldviews while claiming impartiality. Valentine, described as apolitical, reflected the network’s cultural leanings: affable on the surface, yet aligned with progressive orthodoxies on issues like COVID responses — masking, isolation, and vaccination.

Like many who followed official guidance during the crisis, Valentine faced serious illness. He chose voluntary assisted dying (VAD), surrounded by loved ones on his own terms — or so the subsequent media narrative framed it. The press, particularly his ABC colleagues, amplified his story as a dignified exit and a celebration of choice. But this raises uncomfortable questions about the realities of VAD and the signals sent to a vulnerable public. What message does it convey when a beloved figure’s passing becomes a polished promotion of euthanasia? And what does it say about institutional priorities when honours appear intertwined with such narratives?

This episode exemplifies a deeper failure of corporate leadership in Australian government and its agencies. Public institutions like the ABC, funded by taxpayers to the tune of over $1.28 billion annually (roughly 25–30 cents per working taxpayer per day), have drifted from their charters. They serve as echo chambers rather than independent checks on power, cycling with the electoral tides. When the press pushes ALP or Greens-aligned narratives, voters sometimes swing back to conservatives in resistance. Yet the underlying culture persists.

Consider the cautionary tale of Nick Greiner, NSW Premier in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Greiner inherited a corrupt state and acted decisively: he cleaned up government and established the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) to root out wrongdoing. When ICAC investigated him over a political appointment involving independent MP Terry Metherell, it found no criminality. Commissioner Ian Temby’s report nevertheless branded the actions “technically corrupt” — a finding later overturned on appeal by the NSW Court of Appeal, which ruled ICAC had exceeded its jurisdiction. Despite exoneration, independents in a hung parliament used the controversy to force Greiner’s resignation. His government stood out for prudence: NSW was the only state to avoid major losses in the savings-and-loans corruption bubble of the era.

The pattern of selective accountability repeats across decades. A stark example is the case of former NSW Attorney-General and later Supreme Court judge Jeff Shaw. In 2004, Shaw was involved in a low-speed collision with parked cars while heavily intoxicated. Police took him to hospital, where he refused a breath test. Hospital staff took blood samples, but Shaw demanded and removed his own vials, breaking the chain of custody. Months later, when he finally handed them over, tests showed he was substantially over the legal limit. Yet Shaw faced no meaningful consequences. He died in 2010 from alcohol-related illness without ever being brought fully to book for the incident. This episode, involving one of the state’s most senior legal figures, underscores how the system often shields its own.

The ICAC has scrutinised conservatives rigorously but struggles to deliver equivalent accountability on the other side. Allegations of sleaze — from insider dealings to policing failures and drug issues in areas like Cabramatta — often evade deep scrutiny when they touch ALP figures. Political scalpings masquerade as justice, while real systemic failures fester.

Australia’s electoral cycle exposes the rot. Voters oscillate between partisan media manipulation and corrective conservative mandates, yet institutions remain captured. Honours lists, COVID-era policies, euthanasia promotion, selective anti-corruption enforcement, and protection of the powerful all point to the same problem: a failure of corporate governance at the highest levels. Leaders treat the state like a corporation without proper oversight, accountability, or fidelity to founding principles.

James Valentine deserved recognition for his talents and humanity. But turning his personal tragedy into institutional theatre, while broader failures in media impartiality, fiscal prudence, and even-handed justice persist, underscores the need for reform. Australians deserve better than managed decline dressed up as compassion and independence. True leadership would restore standards, not reward the symptoms of their erosion. On this King’s Birthday, let us honour service honestly — and demand institutions worthy of it.

Read full Article
post photo preview
The Vanishing of June 8th
Censorship, Deep State Interference, and the Erasure of Truth on the Northern Territory Conservative

The Vanishing of June 8th: Censorship, Deep State Interference, and the Erasure of Truth on the Northern Territory Conservative

Fellow conservatives, truth-seekers, and those weary of the endless gaslighting from institutions that claim to serve us: something sinister has been uncovered in the archives of this very blog, Northern Territory Conservative. As I recompiled old records with the help of AI—painstakingly reconstructing years of commentary, links, and analysis—a glaring anomaly emerged. June 8th has been effectively excised from the blog's history starting from 2015 onward. Posts, comments, or media embeds from that date? Gone. Wiped. As if the day never existed in the conservative record from the remote heart of Australia.

This isn't some glitch in the matrix or a mundane archiving error. It aligns too neatly with a pattern of targeting I've endured since linking to credible reporting on Syrian chemical weapons programs. Those weapons, it appears, had roots tracing back to Iraq—and ultimately to supplies and knowledge enabled during earlier US policy decisions, including elements connected to the Carter era's defense research and realpolitik transfers in the Iran-Iraq conflict. The United States knew of Saddam Hussein's WMD capabilities in detail because, in key respects, they had facilitated aspects of that program against a common foe. The official narratives around the 2003 Iraq invasion crumbled under scrutiny, yet the deeper story of origins and continuities was inconvenient.

Syria's WMD saga in 2015 was exploding in international headlines—chlorine attacks, OPCW reports, regime accountability debates. My post connecting dots to Iraqi provenance and US historical involvement apparently triggered the machinery. From that point, the Deep State—or its aligned tech and intelligence enablers—has targeted this writer repeatedly. Illegal access to US intelligence streams, funneled through platforms like Facebook and others, has never faced real punishment. Snowden warned us years earlier about exactly this: the NSA's PRISM program and bulk collection sucking in data from Silicon Valley giants, turning private communications and citizen journalism into a surveillance panopticon.

What else vanished with June 8th? Possibly media links and commentary detailing the undermining of then-Prime Minister Tony Abbott by figures like Malcolm Turnbull, Julie Bishop, and Christopher Pyne. The leadership spill that ousted Abbott in September 2015 didn't materialize overnight; the knives were being sharpened earlier amid policy fights over rural Australia, borders, and conservative principles. Or perhaps it captured early observations on Donald Trump's 2016 campaign—clocking the same Deep State corruption that later manifested in endless lawfare, Russia hoaxes, and institutional resistance to the America First agenda. The pattern holds: challenge the narrative on WMD provenance, political betrayals, or the administrative state's overreach, and the record gets scrubbed.

This is personal as well as political. As a whistleblower who paid dearly—losing superannuation, facing financial ruin, and watching a child at risk slip through systemic cracks—I know the cost of speaking truth to power. The corruption that claimed so much has never been fully addressed, and the same forces that seize assets or censor dissent now seem capable of reaching into digital archives. Facebook removals, targeted access, AI-assisted recompilation revealing the gaps: it's all of a piece with Snowden's revelations about unaccountable surveillance.

Mainstream outlets and Wikipedia-style gatekeepers will dismiss this as "conspiracy theory," just as they downplayed institutional bias, election integrity questions, and rural neglect under globalist policies. But conservatives in the Northern Territory—fighting for practical education in Warlpiri communities, resource development, and sovereignty against remote Canberra elites—recognize the game. We value direct knowledge over curated narratives. We remember Abbott's stand on boats and budgets, Trump's exposure of the swamp, and the human cost when WMD truths are twisted for political ends.

The excision of June 8th is a symptom of a deeper malaise: an elite apparatus that deletes inconvenient history while preaching "democracy." They fear recompilation. They fear citizens armed with AI tools reconnecting dots. They fear blogs like Northern Territory Conservative that refuse to bend.

We will not be silenced. The record will be rebuilt. Accountability for surveillance abuses, political knifings, and WMD deceptions demands it. To my readers: preserve your own archives. Question the vanishing acts. Support platforms and voices that prioritize truth over compliance. The Deep State counts on amnesia. We offer memory—and resistance.

David Daniel Ball Northern Territory Conservative Standing for truth in the Outback, June 2026

 

Read full Article
post photo preview
The Poisoned Well
Ethics, Politics, and the Corruption of University Research

The Poisoned Well: Ethics, Politics, and the Corruption of University Research

Universities and research institutions were once beacons of disinterested inquiry, guardians of accumulated human knowledge. Today, many function as gatekeepers of approved narratives, where funding, ideology, and institutional self-interest often trump evidence. The result is not just wasted public money but distorted policy and a creeping erosion of trust in expertise.

History offers stark warnings about research unbound by ethics. Josef Mengele's monstrous experiments on twins in Auschwitz represent the nadir of predatory "science" in service of ideology. His work was pseudoscience wrapped in atrocity; the revulsion it still provokes is universal and justified. Far more nuanced is the case of Dr. William Beaumont in the 19th century. After treating fur trapper Alexis St. Martin, who survived a horrific gunshot wound that left a permanent gastric fistula, Beaumont conducted pioneering experiments on human digestion. St. Martin, unable to resume his trade, entered a long-term, dependent relationship with Beaumont—hired as a valet under successive contracts. Modern ethics rightly flags the power imbalance and exploitation. Yet those experiments yielded foundational insights into gastric physiology that remain valuable. Dismissing them wholesale as "fruit of a poisoned tree" risks throwing out hard-won knowledge alongside the moral failings of their acquisition.

This tension—between ethical progress and the erasure of the past—plays out today. Consider the Siberian Ice Maiden, a 2,500-year-old Pazyryk woman whose remains revealed metastatic breast cancer. She managed pain not with modern pharmaceuticals but through local remedies, including cannabis inhalation. Under certain "green" visions of degrowth or demodernization, such rudimentary approaches could once again become "world-class" care.

Modern research ethics committees were meant to prevent abuses and elevate standards. In principle, they do. In practice, they can become tools for enforcing orthodoxy. Activist groups like PETA champion animal welfare while sometimes engaging in tactics that alienate the public and undermine legitimate science. Treating animals humanely matters; weaponizing the cause into political warfare, including targeting children in ways reminiscent of ideological indoctrination, often proves counterproductive.

Institutional Capture in Australia

Nowhere is the interplay of money, politics, and ideology more evident than in Australian universities, which rely heavily on government funding while claiming independence. They may pursue private contracts, but political pressures persist.

A tragic 1990 rail accident near Cowan, NSW, killed several senior figures from the University of Sydney, including the recently retired Vice-Chancellor John Manning Ward and others connected to university leadership. The resulting upheaval allegedly opened doors to political appointments that bypassed traditional merit-based promotion, tilting governance leftward. Managerial boards with strong factional alignments have, at times, functioned like caucuses, steering priorities away from broad inquiry toward favoured ideological lines—mirroring partisan lockstep elsewhere, such as unanimous opposition to basic electoral integrity measures.

Lighter examples reveal the hypersensitivity. When McDonald's offered to fund a chair in nutrition, the university reportedly declined despite the prospective appointee's willingness to affirm that the company's food could fit a balanced diet. Public perception of compromise prevailed over substance.

More consequential was expert opposition to infrastructure. In the Howard era, senior researchers reportedly dismissed aspects of the Bradfield Scheme (revived ideas for inland water diversion, sometimes linked to "Two Rivers" concepts), citing environmental risks. Yet Australia's variable climate—marked by periodic flooding—suggests such projects warrant pragmatic evaluation rather than reflexive rejection. Subsequent efforts, like Barnaby Joyce's "hundred dams" push, faced state-level blocks. When institutions meant to provide rigorous analysis instead channel activist memes into policy, public frustration grows.

The Broader Corruption

Corruption in this context is rarely crude bribery. It manifests as selection bias in hiring and publishing, funding incentives that reward certain conclusions, and narrative control that sidelines dissenting data. Duplicitous actors may relish hoodwinking systems; those with integrity often self-censor out of fear. The result: thousands of years of accumulated knowledge risk being discounted not for falsity, but for originating in eras with different ethical norms.

True reform demands separating genuine ethical safeguards from political litmus tests. Universities should prioritise independence, transparency in funding, and viewpoint diversity. Research must serve truth-seeking, not social engineering. Otherwise, we risk a future where "world-class" medicine means foraging local herbs while the machinery of knowledge production grinds ever more predictably toward approved ends. The public, rightly, grows sceptical. Restoring credibility requires courage to confront uncomfortable histories without erasing them—and to judge ideas on evidence, not the politics of their proponents.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals