Julie Bishop was Australian Foreign Minister who used her position to upend Tony Abbott as PM, giving aid money to Clintons as they exploited Haiti. The success of her endeavour allowed Malcolm Turnbull to sign Australia to a Paris agreement for which Australia could not benefit. Part of a $100 trillion grift. She also diverted aid money to support Hamas. Challenged on the issue in 2018, Bishop replied she had asked Hamas to assure her they hadn't diverted aid funds for terror.
Julia Gillard, when asked about her work for campus communists, said she had been young and naive, when she was in her thirties and a lawyer. Had Julia been young and naive, too? What has Hamas done since 2018 for their aid money? US moved her embassy to Jerusalem. Australia did not. Bishop had argued it was up to Israel to negotiate with .. ? Terrorists? And what of the arguments against the US embassy move, how did they pan out? If I ask Grok to editorialise, it points to Politico, Wikipedia, NYT and a host of partisan hacks. Avi Yemeni had no cause to call her a moron. But she should argue to an appropriate body that she hasn't funded terror. Because, prima facie, she has. And so have a host of her colleagues throughout the world.
The Greens party in Australia claim to represent the environment, but the reality is they are anti semitic. His concern regarding tax on millionaires was misplaced too. In Australia, for the economic year '22 and '23, Australia's top 1% wealth paid at least 17% tax. Top 10% paid at least 55%. Reform is needed to prevent currency flight.
The Grok editorial excusing the politics, because Grok drawns on partisan sources is disturbing. Read how Grok downplays the corruption
Editorial: Foreign Policy, Aid, and Accountability – The Case of Julie Bishop and Broader Lessons
Julie Bishop served as Australia's Foreign Minister from 2013 to 2018 under Tony Abbott and Malcolm Turnbull. She was a key figure in Liberal Party leadership transitions. While critics on the right accused her of disloyalty during the 2015 and 2018 spills that removed Abbott and later Turnbull, the record shows she retained her deputy leadership position and operated within party processes.
Aid Decisions and Controversies
Australian governments across parties have long funded international aid, including to Haiti post-earthquake and health initiatives via the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI). Bishop continued and extended some commitments initiated under Labor, committing to multi-year funding totaling tens of millions. These programs faced scrutiny over effectiveness and Clinton Foundation governance, leading Australia to wind down ties later. Claims of direct "exploitation" in Haiti remain heavily disputed and lack conclusive public evidence of Australian funds being uniquely misused under her watch.
On Palestinian aid: In 2018, Bishop actively challenged the Palestinian Authority over "martyr payments" (stipends to families of those convicted of terrorism). She sought written assurances, received none she found satisfactory, and redirected ~A$10 million annual funding away from direct PA budget support to more tightly controlled UN humanitarian channels. She stated confidence in prior funds' use but highlighted legitimate fungibility risks. This was a pragmatic adjustment, not endorsement of diversion. No major subsequent audit has proven large-scale direct diversion of the specific Australian contributions to Hamas military activities.
Post-2018 reality: Hamas retained control of Gaza, built military infrastructure, launched the October 7, 2023 massacre, and diverted reconstruction materials for tunnels and rockets. This underscores ongoing aid oversight failures across donors, not just Australia.
Embassy Policy and International Reactions
Australia under Bishop (and subsequently) did not move its embassy to Jerusalem, maintaining it in Tel Aviv while recognizing West Jerusalem as Israel's capital. Bishop argued Jerusalem's final status required negotiation between the parties. The US move in 2018 drew fierce criticism: it would allegedly destroy peace prospects, spark massive violence, and end US neutrality. In practice, predicted regional apocalypse did not materialize. The Abraham Accords advanced normalization, and while tensions persist (exacerbated by Hamas and Iran), the sky did not fall. Australia’s more cautious stance reflected traditional multilateral caution.
Greens, Antisemitism, and Domestic Priorities
The Australian Greens frequently frame Israel-Palestine issues in stark terms that critics, including within Jewish communities, argue cross into antisemitism or selective outrage — e.g., intense focus on Israel alongside softer stances on Hamas, Hezbollah, or other regional actors. Recent years have seen repeated controversies over party statements, protests, and candidates. Claiming to be purely environmental while prioritizing foreign conflicts fits a pattern of mission creep seen in many left-leaning parties.
On taxation: Australia's system is already strongly progressive. In recent years (e.g., 2022-23), the top 1% of income earners pay roughly 17-20% of total personal income tax, while the top 10% contribute around 50-55%. Further punitive "millionaire taxes" risk capital flight, reduced investment, and slower growth — especially in a high-tax, high-welfare nation facing productivity challenges. Genuine reform should target loopholes, efficiency, and broadening the base rather than chasing symbolic wealth taxes.
Broader Reflection
Politicians like Bishop made realpolitik calls on aid and alliances amid imperfect information. Foreign aid has a mixed record globally — noble intent often collides with corruption, diversion, and unintended consequences (see Haiti, Palestinian territories). "Young and naive" excuses from figures like Julia Gillard on past radical ties ring hollow for experienced professionals. Prima facie judgments are easy in hindsight; rigorous audits and conditional funding are better.
Voters deserve transparency: where did the money go? What worked? Australia should prioritize strategic national interest — strong alliances with democracies like Israel and the US, robust counter-terror safeguards in aid, and fiscal discipline at home. Partisan hacks on all sides (Politico, NYT, or local equivalents) thrive on outrage. Facts and results matter more.
=
Grok only has the viewpoint of the ruling left from public service and media. What Grok misses is that Julie Bishop was deputy leader of the conservative party, actively undermining conservative leaders, using resources amassed by conservative supporters. She did so with Turnbull and others. It is a total betrayal of her constituents. She had not asserted a world view on Israel and Australia's embassy, her 'pragmatic advocacy' is directly relevant to October 7th, Ukraine et al. She was in opposition to Trump and vastly outplayed Australia's hand internationally. Failure to recognise that is a partisan position.
