VoiceDDB
Politics • Culture • News
The disasters of 536 AD presaged the new world
and bookended the old
August 29, 2026
post photo preview

The disasters of 536 AD presaged the new world and bookended the old

The volcanic winter of 536, the cold decade that followed, and the Plague of Justinian did not invent a new map of the world. They made the old one harder to keep.

A long war of attrition between the Mediterranean and Iran had already strained both. Greco-Persian conflict, then Roman–Sasanian war, ran for centuries. By the sixth century the two great empires were still formidable, but they were not inexhaustible. Climate shock pushed Persia closer to the brink. Muhammad was born about a generation later, traditionally around 570. He was an unlettered man of Mecca, formed in a world of Arabian paganism and of Christian and Jewish communities already present on the peninsula. After the Hijra he came into conflict with three Jewish tribes of Medina—Banu Qaynuqa, Banu Nadir and Banu Qurayza—who were expelled or, in the last case after the siege of 627, subjected to the judgment that followed a charge of wartime betrayal. Muhammad died in 632. It was not he but the Rashidun caliphs, above all Umar, who took Syria from an exhausted Byzantium: Yarmouk in 636, Jerusalem in 637/638. The climate and plague years of the 530s and 540s sit behind that sequence as a preface, not as a single cause.

Established powers in Europe also changed

From 536 onward the map of European power shifted from a still-recognisable late-Roman world—one surviving imperial state plus several Germanic successor kingdoms—into the fragmented, more northerly political landscape of the early Middle Ages. The volcanic winter of 536, the Plague of Justinian from 541, and Justinian’s wars accelerated that change.

Byzantium: from Mediterranean superpower to reduced eastern empire

In 536 Justinian’s empire was still the strongest state in Europe and the Mediterranean. Belisarius had just begun the reconquest of Italy; North Africa was already recovered. That high-water mark did not last. The Gothic War (535–554) wrecked Italy. After Justinian’s death in 565 the Lombards invaded in 568 and took most of the peninsula; Byzantium kept only the Exarchate of Ravenna, Rome and parts of the south and Sicily. Slavs and Avars overran much of the Balkans in the later sixth and seventh centuries. The Arab conquests of the 630s–640s then stripped away Syria, Egypt and North Africa. By the late seventh century the empire that had once stretched from Spain to the Euphrates was reduced to Anatolia, Constantinople and a few coastal or island holdings. It survived as a Greek-speaking, Orthodox state until 1453, but it was no longer the dominant power in Europe.

Italy: from Ostrogothic kingdom to patchwork

The Ostrogothic kingdom that Theodoric had ruled as a relatively stable Romano-Gothic state was destroyed by the long Gothic War. Italy emerged depopulated and impoverished. The Lombards established a kingdom in the north, with its capital at Pavia, plus independent duchies in the south. Byzantine remnants clung to Ravenna and the south until the eighth century. The popes in Rome gradually became independent political actors. Charlemagne conquered the Lombard kingdom in 774; Italy thereafter remained divided among Frankish and Carolingian successors, the papacy, and later local powers. The peninsula never recovered the unity it had under Theodoric or, briefly, under Justinian.

The Franks: the new western core

The Frankish kingdoms in Gaul were already the strongest of the western successor states in 536. They became the central power of Latin Europe. The Merovingian kings gave way in practice to the mayors of the palace; Charles Martel halted a Muslim raid at Tours in 732. His son Pepin became king in 751 and his grandson Charlemagne, ruling 768–814, built an empire that covered most of modern France, Germany, the Low Countries, northern Italy and parts of central Europe. Crowned emperor in 800, he created the first large post-Roman imperial structure in the West. After the Treaty of Verdun in 843 that empire split into West Francia, the nucleus of France; East Francia, the nucleus of Germany; and a middle kingdom. The Carolingian and later Ottonian worlds shifted Europe’s political centre of gravity northward, away from the Mediterranean.

Spain, Britain and the Balkans

Spain: the Visigothic kingdom continued until the Muslim invasion of 711. Most of the peninsula became al-Andalus; small Christian kingdoms in the north began the long Reconquista.

Britain: Anglo-Saxon kingdoms consolidated after the Roman withdrawal. Conversion to Christianity and later Viking pressure produced larger units, culminating in the rise of Wessex.

Balkans: Slavic settlement and the Avar khaganate replaced much of the old Roman provincial structure; the First Bulgarian Empire emerged in the late seventh century.

The larger pattern

By the eighth and ninth centuries the old Mediterranean-centred late-antique system had given way to a Europe of smaller, more rural, more militarised kingdoms whose elites were often Germanic in origin but Christian and increasingly literate in Latin through the Church. The 536 climatic shock and the plague contributed to population loss and economic contraction that made the old imperial model harder to sustain in the West. Byzantium remained a sophisticated state, but it was now one power among several rather than the heir of a universal Roman empire. The Franks, and later the Ottonians, became the main political reference point for western Europe.

China left a clear paper trail of disaster; India did not

The 536 volcanic winter and the cold decade that followed hit East Asia hard enough to appear in official histories. The Indian evidence is thinner and more indirect.

China

In 536 China was still divided: Eastern and Western Wei in the north, after the Northern Wei split in 534, and the Liang dynasty in the south. Chronicles record anomalies of the same years seen in the Mediterranean.

Summer frost and snow: the Nan Shi notes frost in July 537 and snow in August in Qingzhou that ruined crops. Yellow dust “fell like snow.” Drought and famine followed. Southern courts issued tax amnesties in 538 for twelve famine-struck provinces.

The north suffered worse. The Bei Shi and Zizhi Tongjian describe a “great famine” in Guanzhong, the Wei heartland around modern Shaanxi. Official language says people ate one another and that “70 to 80 percent of the population died” in the worst-hit districts. That is the voice of the chronicle, not a modern census; even as rhetoric it records catastrophe. Inspectors were sent to deal with starving refugees north of the Yellow River.

The haze itself is less explicitly described than in Byzantine or Italian sources—much of China lies south of the latitudes where the thickest veil was reported—but the agricultural collapse is unambiguous. Cold summers, failed harvests and famine struck a society already fragmented by civil war. Some popular accounts tie the event to the “collapse of the Northern Wei,” but that dynasty had already broken apart two years earlier; the climate shock hammered its successor states instead. Steppe groups facing poorer pasture in a cooler, drier Central Asia also increased pressure on the northern frontiers.

China recovered and reunified under the Sui in 581 and then the Tang. The 536 episode was a severe regional catastrophe, not a civilisational endpoint.

India

Direct written testimony of a darkened sun or summer snow is essentially absent. Some reconstructions note that the dust veil was reported mainly north of about 35° N; much of the subcontinent lies farther south, so the optical effects may have been weaker. Tree-ring and monsoon studies show sixth-century variability, but they do not isolate 536 with the same sharpness as Chinese or European records.

What was happening in India was already political and military. The Gupta Empire, which had dominated northern India in the fourth and fifth centuries, was in steep decline. Alchon Hun rulers—Toramana and then Mihirakula—had been campaigning across the northwest and Gangetic plain since the early 500s. By the 530s the Guptas had lost effective control of large parts of the north. Climate stress on the Central Asian steppe may have added to Hun mobility, and poorer harvests would have weakened Gupta revenues and armies, but the Hun invasions themselves predate 536 and are the better-attested cause of Gupta collapse. Later popular writing sometimes folds the 536 event into a single climate-plus-pandemic-plus-migration story of Gupta and later Chola decline; the chronological fit for the Guptas is loose.

South India and the Deccan were less directly tied to the northern Hun wars and show no comparable cluster of disaster reports for these exact years.

Contrast with Europe and Byzantium

China’s bureaucratic historians recorded frost, snow, dust, famine and mortality in the same years Procopius and Cassiodorus described a dim sun. India produced no equivalent contemporary annal for 536. The volcanic winter was a Northern Hemisphere event whose worst documented human effects clustered in Europe, the Mediterranean, and north China. In India the mid-sixth century was already a time of imperial contraction and invasion; the climate downturn was at most an aggravating factor, not the main documented driver.

Beyond the written empires

There were no “nations” in the modern sense, and almost no written chronicles outside the Mediterranean and Nile worlds. What we have for the Americas is archaeology plus ice cores, lake sediments, tree rings and volcanic ash. For most of Africa south of Egypt and Aksum the mid-sixth century is nearly silent in dated texts.

The Americas

Several major societies were active in 536.

Teotihuacan, in the Basin of Mexico, was still the largest city in the Americas, a multi-ethnic highland capital of perhaps 80,000–150,000 people. Its political collapse is usually placed later, around 550–650, when the ceremonial core was burned and the population shrank. Some climate reconstructions show drying and instability in central Mexico in the sixth and seventh centuries; a few scholars treat the 536–540 volcanic forcing as one stress among others—internal conflict, over-exploitation, drought. It was not a sudden 536 wipe-out.

Maya lowlands and highlands: the mid-sixth century is the Early-to-Late Classic “hiatus”—fewer dated monuments, some sites disrupted, possible short drought. Two Central American volcanoes matter locally as well as globally. Ilopango in El Salvador produced the huge Tierra Blanca Joven eruption; recent work dates it to about 539/540 and treats it as a leading candidate for the tropical eruption that shows up in both Greenland and Antarctic ice. Ash buried large areas of the southern Maya highlands and western El Salvador; estimates of local deaths run into the tens of thousands. El Chichón in Mexico has also been proposed around 540. Lowland drought is inferred from lake cores and from the way volcanic cooling can push the Intertropical Convergence Zone south, reducing summer rain. Recovery and the Late Classic florescence followed.

The Moche of the north coast of Peru depended on irrigation in a desert. Quelccaya ice-core records show drought intervals that include the 520s–540s, followed later in the century by heavy rain and then more drought and advancing sand dunes. Around 500–600 the culture reorganised from Moche IV to V: the old capital at Huacas del Sol y de la Luna was damaged by flood, then sand, and power shifted north. Climate is a serious candidate for that stress, alongside internal politics. A single “536 event” is harder to isolate than the longer mid-century swing.

In the US Southwest, tree rings from the Colorado Plateau record extreme cold in 536–545, among the coldest stretches in two millennia. One interpretation is that the shock disrupted scattered early farming groups and helped open the way for the more organised, village-based Ancestral Pueblo pattern that followed. North of Mexico there were no cities comparable to Teotihuacan. Effects would have been on foraging and small farming communities; they leave little dated narrative.

Africa

North Africa was already inside the Byzantine world after Justinian’s reconquest of the Vandal kingdom in 533–534. The same volcanic winter, poor harvests and, from 541, the Justinianic plague that hit the Mediterranean also hit Carthage and the Maghreb. That story belongs with Byzantium, not with a separate African nation.

Aksum, in Ethiopia and Eritrea, was a Christian kingdom that still minted coins and had recently intervened in South Arabia. It sat on the Red Sea trade routes that also served Byzantium and Himyar. Climate model runs for 536/540 suggest cooling plus mixed rainfall: some simulations show dryness over the Sahara, northeast Africa and the Arabian Peninsula in the rainy season, and wetter conditions farther south in East Africa. There is no Aksumite chronicle that says the sun went dark in 536. Any effect would have been on highland agriculture and Nile-headwater rains, not a documented collapse. Aksum remained important into the seventh century.

West and southern Africa: the Ghana, or Wagadu, empire as a named gold-trading state is usually dated later, roughly seventh to thirteenth centuries. Earlier complex societies existed in the Sahel, but they did not leave year-dated records of 536. Meroë and Kush in Nubia had already faded in the fourth century. Sub-Saharan written sources for this exact decade are effectively absent.

What the evidence will and will not support

The 536–540 eruptions were a Northern Hemisphere shock with a tropical component, very likely including Ilopango. Mesoamerica felt both the global cooling and drought pattern and local ash. The Andes felt drought, flood and dune advance on a slightly broader mid-century timetable. Africa south of the Byzantine and Aksumite zones has almost no contemporary testimony.

Linking every later political change to “536” is speculation. The securely documented human disasters remain those written down in the Mediterranean and China, and those read archaeologically in parts of Mesoamerica and the Peruvian coast. The year bookended an older Mediterranean order and prefaced a world in which Islam, the Franks and a reduced Byzantium would share what Rome had once claimed alone. That is a large claim. It is large enough without making the volcano the author of every sequel.

community logo
Join the VoiceDDB Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
00:01:07
November 27, 2022
Jingle Bell Rock

Jingle bell, jingle bell, jingle bell rock
Jingle bells swing and jingle bells ring
Snowin' and blowin' up bushels of fun
Now the jingle hop has begun

Jingle bell, jingle bell, jingle bell rock
Jingle bells chime in jingle bell time
Dancin' and prancin' in Jingle Bell Square
In the frosty air

What a bright time, it's the right time
To rock the night away
Jingle bell time is a swell time
To go glidin' in a one-horse sleigh

Giddy-up jingle horse, pick up your feet
Jingle around the clock
Mix and a-mingle in the jinglin' feet
That's the jingle bell rock

Jingle bell, jingle bell, jingle bell rock
Jingle bell chime in jingle bell time
Dancin' and prancin' in Jingle Bell Square
In the frosty air

What a bright time, it's the right time
To rock the night away
Jingle bell time is a swell time
To go glidin' in a one-horse sleigh

Giddy-up jingle horse, pick up your feet
Jingle around the clock
Mix and a-mingle in the jinglin' feet
That's the jingle bell
That's the jingle bell
That's the jingle...

00:02:04
September 01, 2021
Intro to Locals for the Conservative Voice

David Daniel Ball calls himself the Conservative Voice.

I'm a teacher with three decades experience teaching math to high school kids.I also work with first graders and kids in between first grade and high school. I know the legends of why Hypatia's dad is remembered through his contribution to Math theory. And I know the legend of why followers of Godel had thought he had disproved God's existence.

I'm not a preacher, but I am a Christian who has written over 28 books all of which include some reference to my faith. Twelve blog books on world history and current affairs, detailing world events , births and marriages on each day of the year, organised by month. Twelve books on the background to and history of Bible Quotes. One Bible quote per day for a year. An intro to a science fiction series I'm planning, post apocalyptic cyber punk. An autobiography with short story collections.

I'm known in Australia for my failure as a whistleblower over the negligence death of a school boy. ...

00:01:50
September 04, 2026
Should violent criminals be made fat? Grok says 'no'

No. Transferring gut bacteria from an obese person into a violent criminal is not a reliable, ethical, or effective way to make them “fat, sedentary, and less of a physical threat.”

The science does not deliver the outcome you want

Mouse studies in germ-free animals showed that microbiota from obese donors can increase energy harvest and adiposity compared with lean-donor microbiota. That is the origin of the idea. Human evidence is far weaker.

Randomized trials of fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) from lean donors into people with obesity have generally failed to produce meaningful, sustained weight loss. Microbiome composition can change; body weight and metabolic markers often do not, or the effects are small and inconsistent. Diet and the existing gut environment usually dominate. A 2025 Nature paper found diet outperformed microbial transplant for microbiome recovery. Human guts are already colonized, not sterile like lab mice, so engraftment is variable and effects unpredictable.

It is not a ...

post photo preview
August 28, 2026
Pfizer struggles to answer

Some in Australia are brilliant. Malcolm Roberts Investigates Pfizer over Covid vaccine.

Holiday break is over back to work tonight

Tonight I'll start double posting until I've caught up.

post photo preview
The Press. They built the scaffold
Now they are standing on it, pointing at the carpenter.

They built the scaffold. Now they are standing on it, pointing at the carpenter.

There is no serious dispute about the first term. Prominent American media did not merely cover Donald Trump. They campaigned. “Russia collusion” was the product: Steele’s dossier, Fusion’s clients, Crossfire Hurricane opened without evidence of a conspiracy, FISA built on material the Bureau never corroborated. Durham later said the quiet part in official prose. The newsrooms that sold it as Watergate II did not wait for that report. They had a story that fitted the need. They ran it.

That is the original sin. Everything since is sequel.

In the second year of the second term the White House has ended a privilege, not a right. CNN, MS NOW and Politico can still publish, still interview, still stand on the pavement and call it journalism. What they lost is the desk, the hard pass, the pretence that a 92-percent-negative shop is a neutral utility the executive must house. Vance said it plainly: special access is not the First Amendment. The outlets answered with a lawsuit and the word “ban,” because “we lost the office” does not raise money. Their remaining readers will believe them. That audience was never the country. It was the parish.

The same week, the Washington Post put anonymous officials on a claim that the Pentagon was hiding American dead in the Iran war to protect Pete Hegseth. Hegseth called it a lie. Combat deaths are not a rounding error you bury in a database. If the numbers are wrong, say so with names and next of kin, not a smear dressed as casualty accounting. Using the fallen as a lever against a cabinet officer is not watchdog work. It is the old habit: wound the administration first, verify later, if at all.

Late-night television told on itself. The hosts who treated opposition as a format ran at a loss until the companies noticed. When the act stopped paying, the act ended. That was not censorship. That was a market discovering that partisan monologue is a niche, not a public utility.

Ukraine was never only a European war in the American press. In 2019 it was an instrument. A presidential call, a leaker, a theory that the issue was the asking rather than the facts asked about. Hunter Biden’s Burisma seat was real. The press knew enough to be careful and chose volume instead. They made a song and dance of process so they would not have to sit with the substance. First-term media used Kyiv to raise a president. Second-term policy is the hangover: Biden left a war wired to keep going — money, munitions, and a settlement so costly that Washington will not simply walk the minerals and the lab footprint to Moscow. Trump cut the gift economy. He has not cut the American interest. That is not betrayal of Ukraine. It is the end of writing blank cheques while calling the signer a traitor for noticing the bill.

Venezuela is the tell. Term one: a predatory petro-state, Cuban security architecture, Chinese and Russian leases on the ground. Term two: Maduro in a New York cell, the machine still in Caracas, oil terms rewritten toward the United States. The press discovered “corruption” at the exact moment American reserves and American companies entered the picture. They will concede Havana ran the security state. They will not concede that filling a depleted Strategic Petroleum Reserve from a hemisphere we just opened is preferable to leaving the barrels in Beijing’s and Moscow’s column. It was never about Venezuelan democracy for them. It was about who sits on the crude.

Iran was supposed to be Venezuela at scale: cut the head, force the apparatus, move on. It is not. The war is in month seven. A June memorandum died on the water in Hormuz. Khamenei is gone; the system is not. Russia and China have every reason to keep a wounded theocracy breathing, the way Europe has every reason to keep Ukraine in ammunition. The mullahs can read a calendar. Survive to the midterms, hope a weakened Washington blinks. Trump says a deal after November, or annihilation if there is none. That is a president talking in two registers at once. The press hears only the register that fits the frame.

And that is the point they will not admit. They are not inserting themselves to explain the administration. They are inserting themselves to replace it — commentary as policy, framing as fact, access as birthright. When the access goes, they cry liberty. When the ratings go, they cry culture. When the dossier collapses, they cry that the question is rude.

A free press that reports what happened does not need a briefing-room lease. A partisan press that spent a decade calling the other side illegitimate should not be shocked when the other side stops subsidising the pulpit. They hoisted themselves. The rope was their own copy.

Read full Article
September 21, 2026
post photo preview
SCOTUS Created in politics
meant to stand above it

Created in politics, meant to stand above it

The Supreme Court was born of politics. It was never meant to live as politics.

On 24 September 1789, George Washington signed the Judiciary Act that turned Article III from a sentence into a system. Congress set a six-member Court, district courts, circuit courts, and the office of Attorney General. The most contested piece was Section 25: the power of the Supreme Court to review certain state judgments when federal law or the Constitution was at stake. That was not a decoration. It was the claim that the Union would have one last word on the meaning of the federal compact. John Jay sat as the first Chief Justice. The Court first convened in February 1790. Politics built the machinery. The machinery was supposed to restrain politics.

One hundred and sixty-eight years later, on the same calendar day, that claim was tested in the street.

Three years after Brown v. Board of Education, Arkansas treated a Supreme Court judgment as optional. Governor Orval Faubus used the state National Guard to keep nine Black students out of Little Rock Central High. A federal court had ordered them in. A mob formed. The mayor asked Washington for help. On 24 September 1957 President Eisenhower federalized the Arkansas Guard and sent about a thousand soldiers of the 101st Airborne from Fort Campbell. That night he spoke from the White House and refused to dress the order as a personal crusade. He called it the enforcement of court orders and the prevention of mob rule. The next morning the Little Rock Nine walked in under Army escort. The point was not that Eisenhower had become a civil-rights theologian. The point was that a state could not play “states’ rights” as a veto of federal law once the judiciary had spoken and the executive chose to enforce it. Contemporary coverage treated the troop movement as controversial. The constitutional question was older than the controversy: who prevails when a state defies a federal judgment?

That is the Court the Founders sketched and the First Congress built: a check, not a faction with robes.

The later record is harder to praise without qualification. For a long stretch the Court did not merely umpire disputes; it nationalized moral settlements that legislatures would not, or could not, finish. Abortion is the cleanest example of the inversion. For most of American history the matter sat with the states. In 1973 Roe v. Wade removed it from ordinary politics and declared a constitutional right the text does not name. Whether one welcomed the outcome or despised it, the method was the same: nine justices, then seven in the majority, substituted a nationwide rule for fifty argumentative electorates. Dobbs in 2022 returned the question to the states. That was not “the Court becoming political.” It was the Court admitting that a political question had been dressed as a constitutional command. The honest debate is whether that undoing restored federalism or merely swapped one coalition’s victory for another’s. Both charges can be made. Only one of them can be true about the 1973 method: it was judicial lawmaking.

Other distortions followed the same pattern. Issues that belong in Congress — or in statehouses — arrived at the marble building already earmarked. Oral argument became a ritual around conclusions that ideology had already ranked. Foreign policy, which the Constitution lodges principally with the President and the Senate, has been tugged into litigation strategies that treat district courts as a second State Department. That is not “balance.” It is forum-shopping with a flag.

None of this requires pretending the Court was once a monastery. Nominations have always been political. Marshall was political. The 1930s Court was political. The Warren Court was political. What changed was the habit of treating the bench as the place where unfinished culture wars are finished. A Court that is only a prize for the last election cannot be a check on the next one.

Little Rock is the rebuke to the cheap version of “states’ rights.” Faubus was not defending a reserved power. He was nullifying a federal judgment with soldiers wearing state colours. Eisenhower answered with soldiers wearing national colours. That is ugly. It is also what supremacy looks like when words on paper meet a mob. The Judiciary Act of 1789 anticipated the need. Section 25 was written because the authors did not trust every state court to prefer the Constitution to local passion.

The opposite error is just as real: a Court that confuses supremacy with invention. Protecting the Constitution is not the same as enlarging it until the political branches become spectators. If every urgent cause must be a holding, then elections are theatre and statutes are first drafts.

The Court was created from politics. It has been mired in politics. It was supposed to protect the country from the worst of politics — faction, nullification, and the permanent campaign. It does that only when it does less: enforce the text, police the boundaries between governments, and leave the rest to people who can be voted out. That is a colder vocation than prophecy. It is the one the Act of 1789 actually authorized.

Read full Article
September 21, 2026
post photo preview
United We Stand
Divided We Fall

United We Stand. Divided We Fall.

First guns at sea and a massacre of prisoners; a broken truce that made Drake and Hawkins lifelong enemies of Spain; a treasure still on the bottom; a dying ship that won anyway; and a pass in a boot that saved a fortress and hanged a major. Late September, four centuries of the same themes — cargo, convoy, honour, and who keeps faith once the shooting starts.

Benedict Arnold was a traitor who tried to give West Point to the British. He had intended the death of many. With Major John André, charged with carrying the plans, he achieved one. They met on the night of 21 September 1780. Arnold, commanding the Hudson fortress, had been selling it for £20,000. André came upriver in HMS Vulture, took the maps and the notes on how the defences had been weakened, and took a pass in the name “John Anderson.” American guns drove the Vulture downriver. André had to go overland in civilian clothes with the papers in his stocking. On the morning of the 23rd, three New York militiamen — John Paulding, David Williams and Isaac Van Wart — stopped him near Tarrytown. He first took them for Loyalists, then offered watch and money. They searched him, found the papers, and sent him in. Arnold got word in time and fled to the British. André, taken in disguise with the documents, was tried as a spy, not a prisoner of war, and hanged at Tappan on 2 October. Washington kept West Point. Arnold’s name became the American word for treason. André, young and composed on the scaffold, drew reluctant respect even from some of his captors. Division did its work: one man sold the line; another paid for the meeting.

A year earlier, almost to the day, John Paul Jones said, “I have not yet begun to fight.” Stirring words — and he was already in the middle of a pitched battle. On 23 September 1779, off Flamborough Head, Jones in the converted East Indiaman Bonhomme Richard — named for Franklin’s Poor Richard — met a Baltic convoy with Alliance, Pallas and Vengeance. The escorts were the new 44-gun Serapis under Captain Richard Pearson and Countess of Scarborough. After a ruse with British colours, both sides fired almost together. Two of Jones’s old 18-pounders burst. Outgunned and leaking, he lashed his ship to Serapis so Pearson could not use better sailing and a heavier broadside. The fight ran into the night. When asked if he struck, he gave the line. A grenade down a hatch set off cartridges on Serapis. Pearson struck. Pallas took Countess of Scarborough. Bonhomme Richard was so smashed she sank two days later. Jones shifted his flag to the prize. The convoy escaped, but the Royal Navy had lost two warships in home waters to a rebel squadron. Unity here was oak, lashings and refusal to separate. A dying ship won because its captain would not let the enemy fight at the range that favoured him.

One hundred and thirty-eight years earlier, same stretch of late September, Merchant Royal sank with Spanish gold now valued in the high hundreds of millions, often put over a billion pounds. It was not a battle, except against weather, a leak and broken pumps. On 23 September 1641, off Land’s End, the English merchantman went down. She had spent two years in the West Indies, put into Cádiz leaking, then taken on a Spanish payroll for Flanders — gold, Mexican silver bars, pieces of eight, jewels — on top of her own cargo. Captain John Limbrey and some forty men were taken off by the sister ship Dover Merchant. Eighteen drowned. The wreck was never found. An anchor lifted by a Cornish trawler in 2019 is sometimes claimed as hers; it has not been proved. She is still called the El Dorado of the seas. The gold was too heavy to salvage. Division again, of a blunter kind: hull from pumps, ship from sister, treasure from the men who lived.

Seventy-three years before that, near Veracruz, English ships — branded pirates and slavers by Madrid — fought a losing fight against about thirteen Spanish vessels. Drake escaped. On 23–24 September 1568, John Hawkins’s third slaving and trading voyage into Spain’s American monopoly ended in the harbour of San Juan de Ulúa. Six ships: flagship Jesus of Lübeck, leased from Elizabeth I; Minion; Drake’s little Judith; three smaller craft. They had been selling enslaved Africans and goods along the Spanish Main, often by force, in defiance of the Treaty of Tordesillas. Storm damage sent them in to repair. A Spanish fleet arrived with the new viceroy, Martín Enríquez de Almanza. A truce was agreed so both sides could use the anchorage. The Spanish broke it: boarding parties, shore batteries, a hulk as a platform. Four English ships were sunk or taken. Only Minion and Judith got out. English losses ran to hundreds of men and almost the whole profit of the voyage. Hawkins and Drake called it treachery. Madrid called it the suppression of smugglers. The hatred it planted helped set the tone of later English privateering against Spain. A truce is a form of unity. Break it, and you breed a longer war.

Two hundred and thirty years earlier still, in 1338, the first naval battle of the Hundred Years’ War proved gunpowder useful, but not everything. Off Arnemuiden, usually dated 23 September, five English cogs under John Kingston were carrying wool to Antwerp so Edward III could pay his allies. A French galley fleet under Hugues Quiéret and Nicolas Béhuchet caught them — outnumbered about ten to one, some English still ashore. The flagship Christopher mounted three primitive cannons and one hand-gun: first recorded European use of artillery at sea. Stone and metal at range instead of only arrows, ramming and boarding. It was not enough. After a day’s fighting Kingston surrendered. The French took the ships and the wool, then massacred the prisoners. Chronicles dwell on the handsome Christophe, built at great cost to the English king, and on the crew put to death. The tactical lesson ran against the technological one. Artillery had arrived at sea. Numbers and boarding still decided the day. A small squadron, divided from the shore and from any supporting fleet, died with its new guns.

United we stand. Divided we fall. The proverb is older than any of these fights, and it is not a hymn to sameness. It is a warning about the moment when a line, a hull, a truce or a pass is split from the men who have to hold it. Arnold divided the cause and ran. Jones refused to divide his wreck from Pearson’s stronger ship and took her. Merchant Royal divided from her pumps and her sister and took the gold with her. Hawkins trusted a harbour truce and lost a fleet. Kingston’s five cogs, cut off and outnumbered, learned that the first cannons at sea do not cancel isolation. Late September keeps teaching the same lesson: cargo and convoy matter; honour matters more; and the side that keeps faith after the first shot is the side that still has a fortress, a prize, or a name worth keeping.

 

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals